Search Results for "Statutory purchase"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Statutory purchase"

2975 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2975 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears and Decides Batch of Appeals Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Regarding Compensation for Kakhandaki Village Lands. The Court Examined Market Value Determinations Made by the Reference Court Under Sections 18 and 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

24 Apr 2020

Background: A batch of appeals and cross objections were filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 189...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Interim Application Seeking Section 340 CrPC Proceedings in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute for Alleged Fabrication of MHADA Affidavit. Court Finds Affidavit Was Authentic, E-filed Under Administrative Directions, and Served on All Parties, Negating Claim of Fraud on Court.

23 Feb 2024

The case involved two writ petitions challenging a slum rehabilitation scheme on MHADA land in Bandra East, Mumbai. The petitioners claimed to be MHAD...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute — No Patent Illegality Found in Arbitrator's Interpretation of Contract Terms. The court held that the arbitrator's construction of the contract was a possible view and not perverse, thus no interference under Section 34(2-A) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

2 Mar 2020

The petitioners, Gateway Distriparks Limited and Gateway Rail Freight Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation A...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Decides Tax Deduction at Source Liability for Cellular Mobile Service Providers Under Income Tax Act, 1961 - The Court clarified that obligation under Section 194-H requires principal-agent relationship between payer and payee as per Section 182 of Contract Act, 1872, and payments must be for services in buying/selling goods or asset transactions, not being securities.

28 Feb 2024

The Supreme Court delivered a common judgment addressing appeals by the Revenue and assessees, who were cellular mobile telephone service providers, c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows BH Series Registration for Petitioner's Motor Car Under Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989. Denial of Registration Without Written Reasons Violates Principles of Natural Justice.

12 Apr 2024

The petitioner, Shri Mahendra Bansilal Patil, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the action of the Commi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Tenancy Dispute, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Lower Authorities. Deemed Purchase Claim Under Section 32G of Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 Rejected Due to Lack of Evidence.

5 Jun 2023

The case involves a dispute under the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. The Petitioners, Prabhu Anant Lungase and another, claimed...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Tahsildar's Order Cancelling Mutation Entries in Tenancy Land Dispute — Held That Tahsildar Lacks Jurisdiction to Cancel Certificate Issued Under Section 38(E) of Hyderabad Tenancy Act After 65 Years Without Notice to Affected Parties. The court held that the certificate under Section 38(E) of the Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1950 attains finality and cannot be cancelled by the Tahsildar after such a long lapse of time, and the order was passed in violation of natural justice.

16 Oct 2025

The petitioners, legal heirs of original tenants Ganpati Kundlik Kurule and Abaji Ramji Jadhav, challenged the order dated 04.09.2025 passed by the Ta...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Tahsildar's Order Cancelling Mutation Entries in Tenancy Land Dispute — Exceeds Jurisdiction Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. Tahsildar Cannot Cancel Certificate Issued Under Section 38(E) of Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1950, as Such Power Lies Only with Revenue Tribunal or Civil Court.

16 Oct 2025

The petitioners, legal heirs of tenants Ganpati Kundlik Kurule and Abaji Ramji Jadhav, challenged the order dated 04.09.2025 passed by the Tahsildar, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up Petition Against Company for Failure to Repay Convertible Bonds — Debt Admitted and Company Unable to Pay Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956. The court held that where a debt is admitted and the company is commercially insolvent, a winding up order is justified.

30 Jul 2013

The Bank of New York Mellon, London Branch, as trustee for bondholders, filed a winding up petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 ag...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Conviction in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted. Accused Failed to Prove Cheque Was Issued as Security, Not for Repayment of Loan.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the accused, Vyomesh Jitendra Trivedi, challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the ...

143 144 145 146 147

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)