Section 6 Specific Relief Act – Proof of Possession Mandatory.
5 Mar 2026This case arose from a dispute over possession of a dispensary premises in Mumbai between family members. The plaintiffs claimed that they were in set...
Search Results for "registration date"
8790 result(s) found
Found 8790 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Termination of LIC Agent for Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Supply of Inquiry Report. Disciplinary proceedings set aside as inquiry report not furnished to agent before imposing penalty, violating principles of natural justice under Article 311(2) of Constitution of India.
2 Mar 2023The petitioner, Sri Sutram Suresh, was enrolled as an agent of the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) in March 1999. He received several awards...
- 147
High Court
SALES TAX REFERENCE NO. 52 OF 2009
8 Feb 2019The matter came before the Bombay High Court as two sales tax references arising from the assessment of M/s. Radhasons International, a partnership fi...
- 77
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Reference on Exemption for Bonded Warehouse Sales Under Section 5(2) of Central Sales Tax Act. Legal Issue Concerned Whether Transfer of Documents Before Filing Bill of Entry for Home Consumption Constitutes Sale in Course of Import Before Crossing Customs Frontiers.
8 Feb 2019The matter concerned two sales tax references made by the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal under Section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, arisin...
- 69
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Part on Operational Creditor Status but Upholds Dismissal on Limitation in Insolvency Case. The court held that a purchaser does not qualify as an operational creditor under Section 5(20) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and the application under Section 9 was barred by limitation due to debt arising from 2013 transactions.
4 Feb 2022The appeal arose from a dispute under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, involving the appellant, Consolidated Construction Consortium Limited,...
- 199
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Ex-Parte Injunction in Development Agreement Dispute — No Prima Facie Case for Specific Performance as Agreement Was Only a Draft. The court held that a draft agreement shared for suggestions does not constitute a concluded contract, and the balance of convenience favored the defendant-owner under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC.
20 Mar 2023The applicant, Jatin Jitendra Rasiklal Shah, was the original defendant No.1 and owner of Nazul Plot No. 2/1 in Amravati. The respondent No.1, Shardul...
- 79
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Prosecutrix in POCSO Case, Sets Aside Acquittal of Accused for Kidnapping and Rape of Minor. Court holds that consent of a minor is irrelevant and the victim's testimony is credible despite minor inconsistencies.
27 Apr 2023The case arises from an appeal filed by the prosecutrix (victim) under Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment a...
- 56
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses IDBI Bank's Appeal Against KIADB's Cancellation of Land Allotment for Non-Compliance with Allotment Conditions. The Court held that the allotment letter did not create any vested right in the appellant and that the KIADB was justified in cancelling the allotment due to the appellant's failure to pay the balance consideration and execute the lease-cum-sale agreement within the stipulated time.
28 Apr 2026The appellant, IDBI Bank Limited, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Karnataka challenging the communication dated 20.12.2022 issued by th...
- 228
High Court
Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal in KVAT Penalty Case — Penalty Under Section 70(2)(a) Cannot Be Imposed Without Specific Finding of Mens Rea or Fraudulent Intent. Revisional Authority's Restoration of Penalty Set Aside as Assessee Had Disclosed Purchases in Returns and Paid Tax.
13 Jun 2018The case involves an appeal filed by M/s Bhavani Enterprises, a registered dealer under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, against an order of t...
- 91
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Notification Declaring PFI Unlawful with Immediate Effect under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967. Court Holds That Reasons for Immediate Effect are Sufficiently Disclosed in Notification Itself as Required by Section 3(3) Proviso.
30 Nov 2022The petitioner, claiming to be the President of Popular Front of India (PFI), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the H...
- 73
