Search Results for "SLP"

3749 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3749 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Postal Department, Holds Gramin Dak Sewaks Entitled to Gratuity Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Voluntary Resignation Does Not Bar Gratuity as Section 4(1)(b) of the Act Overrides Rule 6(13) of the Gramin Dak Sewak (Conduct & Engagement) Rules, 2011.

The Supreme Court considered two appeals arising from the Punjab & Haryana High Court concerning the entitlement of Gramin Dak Sewaks (GDS) to gratuit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Partial Enhancement of Compensation in Motor Accident Claim for Non-Award of Future Prospects. 40% Future Prospects Granted to Self-Employed Deceased Aged 23 Under Pranay Sethi Principles.

The appeal arose from a motor accident claim where the deceased, Narshibhai Dhanji Sathwara, aged 23, died in a road accident on 03.02.1987. The claim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Former Police Officer in 29-Year-Old Murder Case. Court holds that custodial interrogation not required when appellant cooperates with investigation and no direct evidence links him to murder.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal against the dismissal of an anticipatory bail application by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana. The appellan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Trust's Appeal Challenging Cancellation of Plot Allotment — Upholds High Court's Decision Based on Subsequent Developments and Consent Terms. The Court declined to interfere as the plot had been validly allotted to another trust under a settlement approved by the High Court.

The appellant, JVPD Scheme Welfare Trust, a public charitable trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, applied for allotment of a plot in M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition in Contempt Case for Violation of Asset Restraint Orders. The court found that the review petitioner failed to show any error apparent on record justifying interference, as the omitted reply did not contradict the factual basis of the contempt findings.

The Supreme Court dismissed review petitions filed by Dr. Vijay Mallya against the judgment dated 09.05.2017, which had found him guilty of contempt o...