Search Results for "Explanation sale"

3270 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3270 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Examines Whether Amended Section 6 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Operates Retrospectively. The Correctness of the Division Bench Decision in Vaishali Satish Ganorkar Holding Prospective Operation is Challenged, with Parties Citing Supreme Court Precedents.

This matter comprises a batch of second appeals before the Bombay High Court, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction, presided over by Justice R.G. Ketkar. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Orders Denying Protected Tenant Statutory Ownership Under Section 38E of Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950. Deemed Purchase Not Defeated by Alleged Refusal of Possession or Compromise by Some Legal Heirs; Compliance with Section 32 Mandatory for Surrender.

The dispute involves a protected tenancy over agricultural land under the Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950. The original tenant, Mal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Challenge Against Disqualification of Sarpanch Under Section 14(1)(g) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959. Mere Receipt of Panchayat Funds by Elected Member Without Proof of Share or Interest in Any Work or Contract Raised Key Question of Statutory Interpretation.

The dispute arose from an order dated 22 April 2025 passed by the Additional Divisional Commissioner, Nashik, in Village Panchayat Appeal No. 100 of 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Petitions in PMLA Case, Upholding High Court's Order with Costs. High Court's dismissal of writ petitions seeking quashing of ECIR and prosecution complaint under Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, was justified as petitions lacked merit and were not maintainable.

The dispute arose from petitions filed by Anoop Bartaria, Director of World Trade Park Ltd., and the company itself, challenging a common judgment and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Reassessment Based on Mere Change of Opinion on Allowability of Deduction and Depreciation Rate is Invalid.

The petitioner, Aventis Pharma Ltd., challenged a notice dated 16th March 2009 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, seeking to reopen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Closure Order for Country Liquor Shop Under Section 142(1) of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949. Licence for Sale of Country Liquor is Not a Fundamental Right and Must Yield to Public Interest.

The petitioner, Satish Damodhar Kasar, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Ben...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Yashwant Sambhaji Dadmal, a police constable, was convicted by the Special Judge, Chandrapur in Special Case No.6 of 1999 for offences ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Entertainment Duty on Amusement Park Admission Fee. Lumpsum Charge for Entry and Entertainment is Subject to Duty Under Bombay Entertainment Duty Act, 1923.

The petitioners, Pan India Paryatan Limited and its director, owned and operated an amusement park in Greater Bombay which opened to the public on 25t...