Search Results for "Default bail"

1632 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1632 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Electricity Theft Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Theft. Conviction under Section 135 of Electricity Act, 2003 set aside as prosecution failed to prove dishonest abstraction of energy beyond reasonable doubt.

The present appeal arises from the judgment and order of conviction passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalna, in Special Case (Elec.) No.11 of 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Prevention of Corruption Act Case — Abetment of Bribe Not Proven. Pan Shop Owner's Conviction Under Section 12 Set Aside as Evidence Lacked Specific Demand and Proof of Mens Rea.

The appellant, Abdul Mannan Mohd. Yusuf, was convicted under Section 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 by the Special Court, Nagpur, in Spe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape and Kidnapping Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 366 and 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Vishal Ramesh Bhalerao, was convicted by the 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Pune in Sessions Case No. 826 of 2012 for offences under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in 1992 Riots Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Delayed FIR. Conviction under Section 326 IPC for causing grievous hurt with dangerous weapon set aside as identification parade was not conducted and FIR was lodged 10 days after incident.

The appellant, Abdul Gani Kamruddin Mulla, was convicted by the Sessions Court for offences under Sections 326 and 452 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Delayed FIR. Conviction under Sections 376, 452, 506 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Vijay Ramrao Mohod, was convicted by the 2nd Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati in Sessions Trial No.14/2005 for offences under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused Who Did Not Enter Witness Box. Acquittal Set Aside as Perverse; Accused Convicted and Fined ₹2,50,000 with Compensation to Complainant.

The appellant, Ivan Singh, filed a criminal appeal against the acquittal of the respondent, Shivaji Tukaram Naik, by the Judicial Magistrate First Cla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 138 NI Act for Dishonour of Cheque Issued as Consideration for Sale Deed. Defence of Security Cheque Rejected as Accused Failed to Rebut Presumption Under Section 139.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Rajendra Mahadeorao Chaudhary (applicant/original accused) challenging his conviction under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inadmissible Confession and Incomplete Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ku. Panchashila Uttam Thorat, was convicted by the II Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Washim in Sessions Trial No. 98/2004 for the mur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Nathaji Tukaram Lohakare, a Talathi (village revenue officer), was convicted by the Special Judge, Solapur, for offences under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Culpable Homicide Case Due to Lack of Intent and Sudden Provocation. Conviction under Section 304 Part II IPC set aside as the act was not intentional but occurred during a sudden quarrel.

The appellant, Shri Chacha @ Gulam Ahmed Vahid-uzma Shaikh, was convicted by the 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, on 17 September 1997 in Sessions...