Search Results for "distinct person"

4038 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4038 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Non-Speaking Order in Sugar Industry Licensing Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice and Previous Court Direction. Order passed without considering objections and contrary to earlier writ court direction to hear petitioners before granting licence to third party.

The petitioners, M/s. Askins Biofuels Private Limited and M/s. Shri Bhramanandasagar Jaggery Industries, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Non-Speaking Order in Sugar Industry Licensing Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice and Binding Precedent. Order of Commissioner for Cane Development set aside for being contrary to earlier court direction and lacking reasons.

The petitioners, M/S. Askins Biofuels Private Limited and M/S. Shri. Bhramanandasagar Jaggery Industries, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition to Restrain Encashment of Bank Guarantee in Contract Dispute — No Concluded Contract Found. Court quashes demand letters and directs status quo, holding that without a work order, there is no concluded contract and invocation is arbitrary.

The petitioner, PG Setty Construction Technology Pvt. Ltd., a construction company, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constituti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Mundkar Declaration — Res Judicata Not Applicable to Mundkar Proceedings Under Goa Mundkar Act, 1971. Prior Civil Court Eviction Decrees Do Not Bar Mamlatdar from Declaring Mundkar Status as Subject Matter and Relief Are Distinct.

The petitioners, Alfredo M. Rodrigues, Paul S. Rodrigues, and Fatima T. Rodrigues, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitutio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Investment Dispute. Court upholds award of damages for breach of investment agreement, finding no patent illegality or perversity in arbitrator's findings.

The case involves a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to an arbitral award dated 15th June 2017. The petitioner...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NOs. 4198 2005, 564 2009, 804 2002,

...