Search Results for "revenue tribunal"

3479 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3479 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Wakf Tribunal's Refusal of Temporary Injunction in Property Possession Suit. Wakf Board's Claim of Public Wakf Property Supported by Registration and Gazette Notification.

The Maharashtra State Board of Wakf filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 83(9) of the Wakf Act, 1995, challenging an order of the Wakf Tri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Income Tax Search and Seizure Action Under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Court Holds That Formation of Reason to Believe by the Authorizing Officer Is Based on Material on Record and Not Open to Challenge Unless Malafide or No Material Exists.

The petitioners, a private limited company and its directors and their relatives, challenged the search and seizure action conducted on 9th and 10th J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Deemed Dividend Case Under Section 2(22)(e) of Income Tax Act. ITAT Correctly Held That Loans to Assessee Were Not Covered as Deemed Dividend Since Lender Companies Had No Accumulated Profits.

The appeal was filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Revenue) against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 20th Fe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Central Excise Duty Demand on Scrap Generated During Car Manufacturing. Generation of scrap during manufacturing process is not a separate taxable event under Central Excise Act, 1944.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Premier Ltd. and New Holland Fiat (India) Pvt. Ltd. challenging show cause notices issued by the Cen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Validity of Transit Fee Levy on Forest Produce Under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act, 1927. High Court Judgments on Transit Fee Rules Challenged in Batch of Appeals from Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh.

This batch of cases before the Supreme Court arose from multiple writ petitions challenging the levy of transit fee on forest produce imposed by the S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Batch of Appeals Involving Transit Fee Levied by Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh Under Indian Forest Act, 1927. Appeals Arise from Differing High Court Decisions on Validity of Transit Rules Framed Under Section 41.

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of cases concerning the levy of transit fee on forest produce. The matter involved three States: Uttar Pradesh, Ut...