Search Results for "IPC 504"

1522 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1522 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder in Circumstantial Evidence Case. Motive, Last Seen, and Recovery of Weapon Sufficient to Prove Guilt Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Ashok Tukaram Awachar, was convicted by the 1st Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Parbhani, for the murder of his wife, Mirabai, under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish the common object and individual overt acts beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from a judgment of the Sessions Court convicting Shankar Sonu More and Ravindra Kashinath More (origina...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Demand for Dowry. Court Held That General Allegations of Harassment Without Specific Demand for Dowry Do Not Attract Section 304-B IPC.

The applicants, Asha Wadmare, Vishal Shejal, Shaikh Irfan, and Momin Abdul Shakil, filed an application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Proc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of NDPS Act. Failure to Record Information and Conduct Personal Search in Presence of Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The appellant, Sri Subramanyam, was convicted by the XXXIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge and Special Judge (NDPS), Bangalore, in Spl.C.C.N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Proceedings in SC/ST Atrocities Case Due to Lack of Public View Element. Alleged Insult Inside House Not in Public View Fails to Attract Section 3(1)(x) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The petitioner, U. Amarnath Shetty, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of the order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Public View Requirement. Alleged Caste-Based Insult in Private Setting Not Attracting Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The petitioners, 22 individuals, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of FIR No. 20...