Search Results for "recovery without inquiry"

1728 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1728 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Quash Criminal Proceedings in Cheque Dishonour Case — Directors of Company Not Entitled to Quashing Under Section 482 CrPC When Trial Already Commenced and No Exceptional Circumstances Shown.

The petitioners, Mrs. Shama G. Bothe and Mr. Guido Bothe, directors of Chinkara Motors Private Limited (CMPL), filed a criminal writ petition under Ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Detenu's Retraction of Statement and Bail Conditions Ignored, Violating Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

The petitioner, son of the detenu Bittu Choith Harchandani, challenged a detention order dated 16.4.2015 passed by the second respondent under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Filed by Sugar Factories and Distilleries Against State of Maharashtra Regarding Excise Transport Fees. Petitioners Challenged Validity of Transport Fee Demands Under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949.

The Bombay High Court, in exercise of its civil appellate jurisdiction, adjudicated a batch of fifty-one writ petitions filed by various sugar factori...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Hears Writ Petition Challenging DRI Circular on Iron Ore Export Duty Classification. Court Finds Alternate Remedy Not a Bar Where Vires of Circular and Constitutional Issues Are Raised.

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed before the Bombay High Court at Goa by V. M. Salgaocar and Brother Pvt. Ltd...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty on Cancelled Development Agreement Under Section 47(c)(5) of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Petitioner entitled to refund as transaction was cancelled before possession and within two years, not covered by Section 48 proviso.

The Petitioner, M/s. Satyam Construction, entered into a Development Agreement on 2 June 2011 with Shri Rajiv Ghule and others for development of land...