Search Results for "judicial services"

4464 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4464 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 27(3) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Summary Trial for Non-Compliance Upheld. Section 27(3) is a complete code and does not violate Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Shri A. G. Sawant, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Clarifies Certified Copy Requirement for Filing Appeal Under Section 61 of IBC, 2016. The court held that an uncertified copy can be filed, but limitation runs from receipt of certified copy.

This judgment arises from a reference made to a single member bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) at Chennai due to a dissent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Refer Dispute to Arbitration Under Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Joint Venture Agreements Not Signed by Appellant, No Arbitration Agreement Between Parties.

The appeal arose from an order dated 8 April 2004 passed by the learned trial Judge dismissing Notice of Motion No. 778 of 2004, which was an applicat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Charge Sheet Against Income Tax Officer for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. Disciplinary proceedings initiated without prior sanction from the Central Government are invalid as the officer was not removable from service without such sanction.

The petitioner, Shri Nai Pal Singh, an employee of the Income Tax Department working as Commissioner of Income Tax (Departmental Representative), file...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Upholds Recruitment Rules of 2015, Dismisses Petition Challenging RFO Seniority List. Petitioners' reliance on superseded 1998 Rules and failure to include all affected parties lead to dismissal; seniority list validated under 2015 Rules.

The petitioners challenged the seniority list based on the Recruitment Rules of 1998, arguing against the application of the Recruitment Rules of 2015...