Compounding of Offences – Definition of First Offence – Discretion of Tax Authorities.
7 Feb 2025Income Tax Act, 1961 – Section 276CC – Compounding of Offences – Discretionary Relief – Interpretation of Guidelines – Supreme Court’s Rev...
Search Results for "criminal trial standard"
1939 result(s) found
Found 1939 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Hears Appeal by Convict Against Conviction Under Sections 302 and 394 IPC for Murder and Robbery. The Court Examines the Admissibility of Test Identification Evidence and Recovery of Articles Under Section 27 of the Evidence Act, 1872.
24 Oct 2018The appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant, original accused no. 1, under Sections 302 and 394 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of t...
- 29
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 324, 504, 506 read with 34 IPC set aside as the sole eyewitness's evidence was inconsistent and lacked corroboration.
31 Aug 2023The appellants, original accused Nos. 1 to 4, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangamner, for the murder of Santu Jayram Ranmale and o...
- 24
High Court
High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole interested witness's testimony was not corroborated and recovery of tainted money was not proved beyond reasonable doubt.
30 Aug 2023The appellant, Babarao Shyamrao Vitalkar, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur in Special Case No.5/1996 for offences under Section 7 and Sectio...
- 14
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.
8 Jul 2014The appellant, Jinnasrao s/o Govindrao Magre, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Jalna for an offence punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Pen...
- 49
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Inconsistencies in Prosecution Case. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.
22 Jun 2010The appellant, Balya @ Baliram Shivram More, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, ...
- 51
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa confirmed conviction of Appellant in Sexual Assault Case Under IPC and Goa Children's Act Due to consistent Evidence and Corroboration
8 Jan 2026The Appellant was convicted by the Children's Court for offences under Sections 341, 354, 375(b), and 376(2)(i) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) r...
- 333
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case and Affirms Conviction for Cruelty Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Conviction Under Section 498A IPC Upheld Based on Reliable Witness Testimony Despite Lack of Proof for Murder or Abetment to Suicide.
16 Sep 2014The case arose from three appeals against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar, in Sessions Case No. 142 of 1992. The original ac...
- 15
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Bounce Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused. The court held that the complainant proved the existence of a legally enforceable debt and the accused failed to rebut the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
20 Sep 2023The complainant, Chidamber S. Nanavate, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(1) and (4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the ...
- 86
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Conviction for Rape of Minor — Victim's Testimony Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence. The court upheld concurrent findings of guilt under Sections 376, 342, and 506 IPC, rejecting the applicant's challenge based on alleged inconsistencies in evidence.
15 Feb 2018The applicant, Sukhdeo Kashinath Mendhule, was convicted by the 16th Ad hoc Assistant Sessions Judge, Nagpur, in Sessions Trial No.611/2002 for offenc...
- 45
