Search Results for "civil dispute versus criminal"

2477 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2477 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Proper Service of Demand Notice. The court held that mere issuance of notice is insufficient; actual receipt by the accused is required for the presumption under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 to arise.

The applicants, partners of M/s. Megapolis Landmar LLP, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 r.w. 34 IPC set aside as dying declaration was not recorded in proper form and prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by original accused Nos. 1, 2, and 3 against their conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Magistrate's Order Directing Investigation Under Section 156(3) CrPC in Liquor Licence Dispute Between Relatives. Application Under Section 156(3) CrPC Filed with Oblique Motive to Harass Licensees, Not for Genuine Investigation.

The applicants, four women who are close relatives of non-applicant No.3, challenged an order dated 4.1.2016 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examined Challenge to Constitutional Validity of Fact Check Unit Provisions in IT Amendment Rules 2023. Petitioners Allege Violation of Articles 14, 19(1)(a), 19(1)(g), 21 and Ultra Vires of Section 79 and Section 87(2)(z),(zg) of Information Technology Act, 2000.

The judgment arose from a batch of writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Three Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Motive. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The Bombay High Court, by a common judgment, allowed three criminal appeals filed by Akshay Laxman Pachphule (original accused No. 1), Mayur Vilas Pac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Demolition Order Under Section 133 CrPC for Non-Compliance with Conditional Order Requirement. The court held that the mandatory procedure under Section 133 CrPC was not followed as no conditional order was passed, and the report was misinterpreted.

The applicant, Shrikant Shankarrao Agnihotri, challenged an order dated 6 June 2017 passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Akola under Section 133 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Appoints Sole Arbitrator for Micro Enterprise Against Central Railway Under MSMED Act, 2006. Conciliation Failed, Arbitration Agreement Exists, Court Appoints Retired Judge as Arbitrator Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, M/s. Microvision Technologies Pvt. Ltd., a company registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1956 and a micro enterprise under the Mi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Review and Recalls Sale Order in Execution Decree Case Due to Factual Error Regarding Payment. Contempt Petition Disposed with Compensation for Violating Interim Orders.

The case originated from a money suit filed in 1955 by Hari Kishan Das (plaintiff) against M/s Diwan Kripa Ram Radha Kishan (defendant), resulting in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Orders Restoration of Possession Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act for Forcible Dispossession. Plaintiff Proved Prior Possession and Forcible Ouster by Defendant with Armed Men, Entitling Him to Summary Remedy Without Proof of Title.

The plaintiff, Om Nath Chudamani Sharma, filed a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, seeking restoration of possession of Flat No. ...