Search Results for "vendor purchaser contract"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "vendor purchaser contract"

305 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 305 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Plaintiff's Claim of Bonafide Purchase Fails as Prior Decree in O.S.No.34 of 1984 Was Binding and Sale Deeds Were Executed During Pendency of Litigation.

17 Mar 2026

The appellant, H.Prema Devakumari, was the unsuccessful plaintiff in a suit for declaration and injunction. She claimed to have purchased plot No.9 fr...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Refusal to Register Relinquishment Deed Due to Name Discrepancy. Court Directs Registration Subject to Compliance with Rule 55A of Tamil Nadu Registration Rules, 2000 and Production of Identity Certificate.

20 Jan 2025

The petitioner, Mohammed Assan, and his brother K.Mubarak @ Abdul Mubarak jointly purchased landed property in Tenkasi Village through a registered sa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Discharge Petition in Land Grab Case — Petitioner Not Entitled to Discharge as Prima Facie Case Made Out Under Sections 425, 463, 468, 471, 474, 120-B IPC. Allegations of Conspiracy to Grab Government Land and Execution of False Sale Deeds Constitute Prima Facie Case Against Petitioner.

10 Dec 2024

The petitioner, Sujit Suhasrao Deshmukh, an advocate, filed a criminal writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Impleadment of Purchaser Pendente Lite. Order 1 Rule 10 CPC Impleadment Proper as Purchaser is Necessary Party to Avoid Multiplicity of Proceedings.

21 Mar 2023

The petitioner, Fabrica Da Igreja De Vasco, purchased the suit property from the original defendant No.1 during the pendency of a suit filed by respon...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Part on Operational Creditor Status but Upholds Dismissal on Limitation in Insolvency Case. The court held that a purchaser does not qualify as an operational creditor under Section 5(20) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and the application under Section 9 was barred by limitation due to debt arising from 2013 transactions.

4 Feb 2022

The appeal arose from a dispute under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, involving the appellant, Consolidated Construction Consortium Limited,...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Case, Holds Suit Barred by Limitation Under Article 54 of Limitation Act, 1963. The Court restored the trial court's dismissal of the suit for specific performance as the suit was filed beyond three years from the date fixed for performance under the agreement to sell.

1 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the original defendants against the High Court's judgment decreeing specific performance of an agreement...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Cheating Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute. Failure to Perform Contractual Obligations Does Not Attract Criminal Liability Under Sections 406 and 420 IPC Without Proof of Fraudulent Intent at Inception.

27 Sep 2019

The case involves a criminal writ petition filed by V.B. Padode and M/s. Dataline and Research Technologies (I) Ltd. (the petitioners) challenging the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application to File Written Statement and Counterclaim Under Order 8 Rule 1 CPC — Petitioner Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Delay Beyond 90 Days. The court upheld the trial court's discretion in refusing to condone the inordinate and unexplained delay in filing the written statement, holding that the statutory period under Order 8 Rule 1 CPC cannot be extended beyond 90 days except in exceptional circumstances.

28 Aug 2019

The petitioner, Vesta Building Products Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 30 ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Plaintiff's Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application for Appointment of Commissioner in Suit for Specific Performance. Court holds that appointment of commissioner for measurement of suit property is not permissible under Order 26 Rule 9 CPC when the purpose is to collect evidence for proving the case, as the commissioner's role is limited to elucidating matters already in issue.

23 Oct 2018

The petitioner, Mallappa, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 02.03.2015 passed b...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Binding on Owner as Attorney Exceeded Authority. Court holds that a power of attorney must be strictly construed and the attorney cannot bind the principal beyond the express terms of the power, setting aside the decree for specific performance.

15 Jan 2013

The 1st respondent, R. Krishnamurthy, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell property No.1236, 3rd Cross, I Block, HAL III Stag...

12 13 14 15 16

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)