Search Results for "undivided shares"

269 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 269 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Family Property Dispute — Land Sold Without Consent of Co-Owners. Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Section 44 — Co-owner cannot transfer undivided share to stranger without consent of other co-owners.

The present appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 27.12.2019 passed by the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Umbergaon, in Special Civil ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Adoption Dispute Due to Abatement — Conflict of Decrees Would Arise if Appeal Proceeded. Right to Sue Did Not Survive to Surviving Appellant Alone; Appeal Abated as a Whole Under Order XXII Rule 3 CPC.

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal arising from a suit challenging the validity of an adoption. The appellants, two brothers, had filed a suit seek...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal for Non-Prosecution in Partition Suit — Appellant Absent Despite Adjournments. Failure to Appear Leads to Dismissal Under Order XLI Rule 17 CPC.

The appellant, Domegunta Venkatasesha Reddy, filed a Regular First Appeal under the Partition Act before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru agai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Finding of No Common Property. Suit for partition and separate possession fails as plaintiff failed to prove that suit schedule properties were joint family properties.

The appellant, Domegunta Venkatasesha Reddy, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Sale by Brother for Legal Necessity Upheld. Daughters' Claim for Partition Dismissed as Sale Deed Dated 28.3.1968 Was Supported by Legal Necessity and Prior Conditional Sale.

The case involves a partition suit filed by two daughters (plaintiffs) against their brother Tukaram and the appellant (defendant no.1), who purchased...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved and Suit Barred by Limitation. Plaintiff failed to prove execution of agreement and suit was filed beyond three years from notice of refusal under Article 54 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The appellant, Sandeep Kashinath Parab, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 15/06/1998 allegedly executed by the respo...