Search Results for "temple possession"

783 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 783 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Appeals Against Vacation of Temporary Injunction in Property Partition Dispute. Grandchildren Seek Share in Ancestral Properties Alleging Attempts to Alienate Suit Properties.

The matter pertains to two appeals filed against the order of the XIV Additional City Civil Judge, Bengaluru, dated 26 September 2019, in Original Sui...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Land Grabbing Case Due to Application of Res Judicata. Prior Civil Court Decree Conclusively Determined Title and Possession, Barring Re-litigation Under Section 8 of Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982.

The dispute originated from an application filed by the legal heirs of S.V. Srinivasulu Naidu under Section 8 of the Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Appeal Against Trial Court Decree for Declaration and Possession of Party Premises; Issues of Maintainability of Representative Suit and Effect of Election Commission Recognition on Property Rights Considered

The dispute concerns premises No.3, Race Course Road, Bangalore, claimed by the Indian National Congress through its Karnataka Pradesh Congress Commit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Trustees' Petition Challenging Appointment of Administrator for Shree Shanaishwar Devasthan Trust. Court upholds Collector's order under Section 41A of Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950, finding no procedural irregularity.

The petitioners, trustees of Shree Shanaishwar Devasthan Trust (Shingnapur), filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Collector, Ahilyanagar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Maintainability of Civil Suit Challenging Registration of Land as Public Trust Under Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950. The core issue pertains to whether the land is madad-mash inam, which falls outside the purview of the Trust Act, thus the civil court has jurisdiction.

The second appeal arose from a civil suit filed by the original plaintiff (appellant) challenging the registration of his agricultural land as a publi...