Search Results for "tax penalty interest payment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "tax penalty interest payment"

862 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 862 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes GST Provisional Attachment Order for Violation of Natural Justice. Attachment of Bank Accounts and Property Without Prior Hearing Held Invalid Under Section 79(1)(c) of CGST Act, 2017.

26 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Navin Vishwanathan, proprietor of M/s. Oriental Facility, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 300A of the Constitution of Ind...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Leave to Appeal to SEBI in Securities Law Case — Interim Relief Denied as Trial Court's Discharge Order Not Shown to be Manifestly Illegal. SEBI's Application for Leave to Appeal Under Section 22 of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 Against Discharge of Accused in Criminal Complaint for Violation of Securities Laws.

24 Dec 2025

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) filed an application for leave to appeal against an order of the trial court discharging Mahendra Sh...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — Compliance with Section 271AAA(2) Conditions is Mandatory but Penalty Must Be Proportionate to Undisclosed Income. The Court held that penalty under Section 271AAA(1) is computed at 10% of undisclosed income, not entire returned income, and part compliance with condition (iii) warrants proportionate reduction.

4 Mar 2025

The appeal arose from a penalty order under Section 271AAA of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for Assessment Year 2011-2012. The appellant, K. Krishnamurthy...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Intra-Court Appeals Against Order Upholding Blocking of Electronic Credit Ledgers Under Rule 86A of CGST Rules; Considers Requirement of Pre-Decisional Hearing and Bonafide Purchaser Protection.

2 Apr 2024

The appeals arose from a common order dated 27.07.2023 passed by a Single Judge in a batch of writ petitions, rejecting the contentions of the appella...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Designated Authority to Revise Form-3 Under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 to Give Credit for Taxes Paid Under Income Declaration Scheme, 2016. Designated Authority's Refusal to Adjust Amount Already Paid by Assessee Under IDS, 2016 While Computing Amount Payable Under DTVSV Act Held to Be Contrary to the Object of the Settlement Scheme.

4 May 2023

The petitioner, Sunil Wamanrao Sakore, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a writ of mandamus to direct respondent No.2 (Commis...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Sales Tax Dispute Over Time Charter Agreement — Holds That Time Charter Is a Service Contract, Not Transfer of Right to Use Goods. The Court ruled that a time charter does not involve transfer of possession or control, thus not taxable under Section 5C of Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957.

4 Dec 2019

The appellant, The Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd., owned a tug named 'Kumari Tarini' and entered into a Time Charter Agreement dated 8.1.1998 with th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act in Demurrage Dispute, Upholding Concurrent Findings Below. Clause 10(v) Held to Create Direct Liability for Demurrage, Not Indemnity, and Counterclaim for Option Cargo Damages Rejected.

21 Dec 2016

The dispute arose from a coal supply contract dated 18 September 1999 between the appellant, an Indian company, and the respondent, an Australian comp...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Upholding Demurrage Claim. Interpretation of Clause 10(v) of Coal Supply Contract as Creating Primary Liability, Not Indemnity, and Binding Effect of Laytime Statement When No Disagreement Raised Within 30 Days Upheld.

21 Dec 2016

The dispute arose out of a contract dated 18 September 1999 between Ultratech Cement Ltd. (appellant, formerly Larsen & Toubro Ltd.) and Sunfield Reso...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission Order Under Section 245D(4) of Income Tax Act — No Jurisdictional Error Found in Rejecting Settlement Application for Non-Disclosure of Full Income.

22 Feb 2012

The petitioner, Major Metals Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 30 December 2010 passed by t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission's Power to Levy Interest Under Section 234B When No Interest Was Charged in Original Assessment. Interest under Section 234B(4) can only be increased or reduced if it was initially chargeable under the original assessment order.

2 Jul 2010

The petitioner, Akbar Travels of India Pvt. Ltd., an IATA approved travel agent and money changer, filed returns for Assessment Years 2002-03 to 2006-...

12 13 14 15 16

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)