Search Results for "setting aside exparte decree"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "setting aside exparte decree"

203 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 203 result(s)

High Court

Karnataka High Court Decides Appeal by Bangalore Development Authority Against Injunction Decree in Land Acquisition Dispute. Court's Final Decision Not Reached in Provided Text as Judgment Excerpt is Incomplete.

29 Nov 2022

The appeal arose from a suit for permanent injunction filed by the plaintiffs, brother and sister, claiming ownership and possession of land in Survey...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Tenant's Petition Challenging Eviction Decree Under Maharashtra Rent Act, 1999 — Notice Under Section 15 Held Valid Despite Inclusion of Time-Barred Rent Claim, but Eviction on Bonafide Need Set Aside as Landlord Gave Up That Ground.

15 Oct 2010

The petitioner, a tenant, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and order dated 27/4/...

High Court

Bombay High Court Clarifies Maintainability of Revision Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 — Interlocutory Procedural Orders Not Revisable. Division Bench Holds That Revision Under Section 34(4) is Limited to Orders Affecting Rights or Liabilities of Parties and Does Not Extend to Purely Procedural Orders Passed Under CPC.

21 Jan 2013

The Bombay High Court was seized of three writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging orders passed by the Court of Small Causes ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition to Restore Suit Dismissed for Default, Setting Aside Order That Rejected Restoration on Ground of Arbitration Agreement. Court holds that dismissal for default does not bar restoration and that the trial court must decide the application under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 on merits.

25 Sep 2025

The petitioner, K. M. Dastagir Sab, filed a suit (O.S.No.1280/2020) before the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, seeking rel...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals as Not Maintainable: Order on Territorial Jurisdiction Not Appealable Under Section 13 of Commercial Courts Act. The Court Holds That Orders Under Section 9-A CPC Are Not Enumerated in Order XLIII CPC or Section 37 Arbitration Act, Limiting Appeals in Commercial Disputes.

14 Sep 2017

The dispute arose out of two commercial suits filed before the Bombay High Court, where the plaintiffs claimed reliefs and the defendants raised preli...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Property Suit — Rejects Plaint Rejection Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Suit for Partition and Declaration Not Barred by Limitation as Cause of Action Arose from Denial of Title in 2019.

21 Jul 2022

The case involves a civil revision petition filed by the defendants (petitioners) against an order of the trial court rejecting their application unde...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Suit for Permanent Injunction — Lower Appellate Court's Finding of Easement by Prescription Set Aside as Perverse. The plaintiff failed to prove continuous user for 20 years as required under Section 15 of the Indian Easements Act, 1882, and the lower appellate court's judgment was based on misreading of evidence.

23 Apr 2016

The case involves a suit for permanent injunction filed by the respondent-plaintiff, M. Girija, against the original defendant, Angadi Srinivas (since...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree in Tenant Eviction Case — Bonafide Requirement and Lapse of Lease Term Upheld. The concurrent findings of fact by the trial court and appellate court were not shown to be perverse or illegal, and the revision was dismissed.

26 Mar 2015

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the original defendant (tenant) against the respondent (original plaintiff/landlord) challengi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Debt Recovery Pre-deposit Dispute — Holds Section 21 Not Applicable at Condonation Stage. The court ruled that the pre-deposit requirement under Section 21 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 applies only at the stage of entertainment of appeal, not at the stage of considering an application for condonation of delay.

18 Mar 2016

The petitioners, M/s. Deluxe Cotton Corporation and others, challenged an order dated 14 July 2014 of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT), Mum...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Interim Injunction in Pledge Enforcement and Share Transfer Dispute — Application Seeks to Restrain Voting and Transfer Rights Over Pledged Shares. Pledgee Rights Under Section 176 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 and SEBI Takeover Code Disclosure Obligations Are Central to Dispute.

4 Sep 2023

The matter arose from Interim Application (L) No. 29574 of 2021 filed in Commercial Suit No. 189 of 2022 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay...

12 13 14 15 16

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)