Search Results for "registration rules"

4137 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4137 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension of Medical Practitioner by Maharashtra Medical Council for Violation of Natural Justice. Suspension Order Set Aside as Council Failed to Provide Personal Hearing Before Suspending Registration Under Section 22 of Maharashtra Medical Council Act, 1965.

The petitioner, Dr. Sadanand Madhukar Ingle, a medical practitioner, challenged the order dated 26 December 2013 passed by the Maharashtra Medical Cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of GST Registration for Vague Show Cause Notice — Violation of Natural Justice. Show cause notice lacking specific allegations of fraud or suppression of facts renders cancellation order unsustainable under Section 20 of IGST Act read with Section 107 of CGST Act.

The petitioner, Makersburry India Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order dated 26 April 2023 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of State Tax (Appellate Authori...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Firm's Registration Under Section 26A of Income-tax Act, 1922 as Partnership Deed Read Reasonably Specified Equal Shares. Specifying Equal Division Among Partners Sufficiently Indicated One-Third Share Each, Satisfying Statutory Requirement for Registration.

Three brothers entered into a partnership in 1949 for doing business. The partnership deed, in clause 3, allotted equal capital to each partner, and c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Delivered Common Order in Writ Petitions Seeking FIR Registration and SIT Investigation into Alleged Cartelization in TANGEDCO Transformer Tenders. The Court Examined Allegations of Identical Bidding and Inflated Procurement Costs Causing Loss of Rs.397 Crores to Public Exchequer.

The judgment pertains to three writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, heard analogously by the Madras High Court. The pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Food Safety Authority’s Advisories Allegedly Amending Regulations Without Statutory Power. Validity of Advisory Issued Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, Questioned as Ultra Vires Section 92 of the Act.

A writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by Vital Nutraceuticals Private Limited and the Indian Drug Manufacturers’ ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Expulsion of Trading Member for Violating Gross Exposure Limits and Failing to Maintain Capital Adequacy. Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 - Section 22F - Appeal against Securities Appellate Tribunal order upholding expulsion from National Stock Exchange membership.

The appellant, Rusoday Securities Ltd., was a trading member of the National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. (NSE) since November 1994 and gave an undert...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Penalty Under Section 10(b) of CST Act for Alleged Misuse of C-Forms. The Court Examined Whether Penalty is Leviable When Goods Were Covered in Registration Certificate and There Was No Dishonest Intention.

The combined proceeding involved appeals and revision petitions against orders relating to penalty under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Two dealers,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Delay Condonation in Mutation Entry Challenge. Court holds that delay in challenging mutation entry cannot be attributed to petitioner when authorities failed to comply with statutory duty under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code.

The petitioners, Shankarrao Premaji Banarase and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Nagpur challenging the order dated 30/0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Permission for New Co-operative Society. Petitioner's Existing Society Not Entitled to Object as No Statutory Bar Under Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959.

The petitioner, Prathamik Krushi Pattin Sahakari Sangh Niyamit, Tekkalkote, an existing co-operative society registered under the Karnataka Co-operati...