Search Results for "promotion orders"

1930 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1930 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Promotions of Junior Engineers to Deputy Engineers in Nagpur Municipal Corporation. Petitioners failed to establish that the promotion policy violated statutory rules or that the seniority list was arbitrary.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by employees of the Nagpur Municipal Corporation challenging the promotion of Junior Engineers to De...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds OROP Benefit for Army Postal Service Personnel on Deputation from Department of Posts. Personnel of APS on deputation from Department of Posts are entitled to One Rank One Pension as per Government Circular dated 7th November 2015.

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India against an order of the Armed Forces Tribunal, Regional Bench, Jabalpur, which allowed an Original A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Challenge to Promotion of Deputy Director of Health Services — Seniority and Eligibility Criteria Upheld. The court held that the promotion based on seniority-cum-merit was valid and the petitioner failed to establish any arbitrariness or violation of rules.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Dr. Prakash Nachinolkar and Dr. Ruando E.J. J. De Sa challenging the promotion of Dr. Sanjiv Dalvi a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in BHU Promotion Case — Estoppel Cannot Override Statutory Service Rules. Board of Examiners Exceeded Jurisdiction by Introducing Interview and Written Test for Promotion from Class IV to Class III Under Banaras Hindu University Manual, Para 6.4.

The case pertains to a challenge by Class IV employees of Banaras Hindu University (BHU) against the promotion of 14 Class IV employees to Class III (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Seniority List of Section Supervisors in EPFO. Seniority Determined by Date of Promotion, Not by Date of Eligibility, Upheld by CAT.

The petitioners, Smt. L.M. Mahadik and Shri S.D. Jagtap, filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Re-fixation of Pay for Retired District Judge from Date of Promotion with Interest. Petitioner entitled to pay re-fixation from promotion date and junior's promotion dates with 6% interest on delayed arrears.

The petitioner, a retired District and Sessions Judge, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking re-fixation of his...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Employees' Seniority and Promotion Rights in Service Regularization Dispute - Continuity of Service Entitles Counting of Retrenched Period for Promotion Without Monetary Benefits Under Article 226 of the Constitution.

The dispute originated from the appointments of the respondents as Assistant Managers on contract in 2000, which were regularized in 2006 under the Ke...