KAHC010068412019_1
16 Aug 2019...
Search Results for "processing costs"
896 result(s) found
Found 896 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Electricity Contract Dispute — Refund of Excess Demand Charges Granted for Delayed Load Reduction. Held that Electricity Board's unreasonable delay in processing application for reduction of contracted load from 23000 KVA to 10000 KVA entitles consumer to refund of excess charges paid under protest.
6 Jul 2023The appellant, The Madras Aluminium Co. Ltd., a company established in 1965 for manufacturing aluminium, was declared a sick industrial unit under Sec...
- 130
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Petitions Challenging Tender and Work Orders in Cooperative Milk Marketing. Petitions Filed by Warehousing Agent and Co-Packer Against Karnataka Cooperative Milk Federation and Its Unions Alleging Breach of Exclusive Contracts for Telangana Operations.
1 Jun 2026Background: The case involved two writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging certain actions of the Karnataka Co-operative Mi...
- 51
High Court
Karnataka High Court Allows Online Liquor Delivery Platform in Excise License Dispute. The court held that the petitioner's order processing and delivery services do not amount to 'sale' under the Karnataka Excise Act, 1965, and quashed the Excise Commissioner's letter demanding a license.
13 Sep 2019The petitioner, Hip Bar Pvt. Ltd., is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013, offering a semi-closed prepaid payment instrument (mobile ...
- 179
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Regularisation of Encroachment on Communidade Land at Reduced Rate — Petitioner's Long-Standing Encroachment Prior to Cut-Off Date Entitled to Regularisation at Rate of ₹1,500 per sq.m. Instead of ₹3,600 per sq.m. The Court held that the rate of ₹3,600 per sq.m. was arbitrary and not based on any valid criteria, and directed regularisation at the rate of ₹1,500 per sq.m. as per the Government Resolution dated 30.08.2004.
12 Mar 2020The Petitioner, Mrs. Martha Luis, filed a writ petition challenging the determination of a rate of ₹3,600 per square metre levied upon her for regul...
- 168
High Court
Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Patent Refusal for Lack of Inventive Step and Enablement. Controller's order upheld as amended claims were not enabled and lacked inventive step under Patents Act, 1970.
29 Jan 2025The appellant, Caleb Suresh Motupalli, filed a patent application for an invention titled 'Necktie Persona-Extender/Environment-integrator and method ...
- 98
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Clarifies Legal Position on 'Same Line of Business' in Withdrawn Insolvency Appeal Involving Cooperative Society. The Court Examined Section 64(d) of the Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002, and Eligibility Under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Without Deciding Merits After Appellant Sought Withdrawal.
9 Apr 2026The Supreme Court addressed a statutory appeal arising from the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal's judgment dated 21.08.2025, which affirmed th...
- 520
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Review of Contempt Order in Teacher Transfer Case — Finds Mistake Apparent on Face of Record. The court held that the contempt order directing preferential processing of certain teachers' claims violated the transfer policy and the original judgment dated 22nd February 2019.
24 Jul 2019The case arises from a contempt petition (Contempt Petition No. 147 of 2019) arising out of Writ Petition No. 4190 of 2018. The original judgment date...
- 87
High Court
Madras High Court Quashes Tax Demand Against Auction Purchaser in TNVAT Recovery Case — Priority of Crown Debt Over Mortgagee's Right. The court held that a bona fide auction purchaser who buys property through a mortgagee's sale under Section 69 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 takes the property free of all encumbrances, including subsequent tax demands under Section 24 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006.
21 Jan 2025The petitioner, D.K. Sadasivam, was the successful purchaser of a property (S.Nos. 7/10, 7/11 and 13/1 in Sigarahalli Village, Pennagaram Taluk, Dharm...
- 82
High Court
- 22
