Search Results for "paid"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "paid"

17676 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 17676 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Interest on Refund Under Section 244A(1)(a) of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Refund Arising from Appellate Order Reducing Income Below Returned Income Qualifies for Interest Irrespective of 10% Threshold. The court held that Section 244A(1)(a) applies to refunds of advance tax, TDS, and self-assessment tax, and interest is payable from the date of payment, not from the date of assessment.

9 Feb 2024

The appellant, Ceat Limited, filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribuna...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Writ Petition Seeking Refund of Stamp Duty on Unexecuted Instrument Under the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Court examines whether payment of stamp duty without execution of an instrument constitutes a valid charge and whether writ jurisdiction can be invoked for refund beyond the statutory limitation period, focusing on the definition of ‘instrument’ under Section 2(l) and the scheme of Sections 47 and 48.

12 Dec 2025

The writ petition raised the question whether the High Court’s extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution could be invoked to ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Denial of Interest on Refund Under Section 214 of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Held That Interest Is Mandatory and Must Be Paid on Entire Refund Amount from Date of Payment of Advance Tax.

10 Aug 2005

The petitioner, M/s. Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 14.6.1988 passed by the Commissioner of Income Ta...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Sales Tax Reimbursement Dispute — Clarifies That Sales Tax on Works Contracts Is Levied on Goods Component, Not on Completed Items of Work. Clause 45.2 of GCC Does Not Apply When Tax Is on Transfer of Property in Goods Involved in Works Contract.

5 Jun 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Orissa against the judgment of the Orissa High Court. The dispute arose from works contract...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal on Compensation for Loss of Agency as Revenue Receipt Under Section 10 of Income-tax Act. Compensation for Loss of One Among Many Agencies in Normal Course of Business is Taxable Revenue Receipt.

2 Nov 1965

The case involved a dispute over the taxability of compensation received by the respondent, a multi-agency concern, upon termination of one of its num...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru considers batch of income tax appeals under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging ITAT orders for assessment years 2001-02 to 2004-05. Assessee and Revenue both seek to set aside the ITAT decisions and frame substantial questions of law.

25 Mar 2015

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru dealt with a batch of income tax appeals filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeals a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Petition Against Rebate Claim on Exported Inputs/Capital Goods. Reversal of Cenvat Credit Does Not Constitute Payment of Duty for Rebate Under Rule 18 of Central Excise Rules, 2002.

23 Mar 2011

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Raigad filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Joint Secretary to the Government of India dated 4 June 2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers GST Liability on Royalty Payments to Court Receiver in Commercial Property Dispute. The Court Examines Whether Payments to a Court Receiver Under Order XL CPC Constitute Taxable Supply Under the CGST Act, 2017 and Whether GST Should be Discharged via Reverse Charge Mechanism.

13 Sep 2019

The Bombay High Court, in a Court Receiver's Report arising from a commercial suit for recovery of possession of three shops used as a restaurant, exa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application of Sub-Tenant in Rent Control Matter. Sub-tenant with paid-up capital less than Rs 1 crore held entitled to protection under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 despite tenant's exclusion under Section 3(1)(b).

18 Apr 2024

The case involves a dispute over the applicability of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 to a sub-tenant. The applicant, Frick India Ltd, claimed ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Workman's Appeal on Distribution of Company Assets in Liquidation. Holds that Secured Creditors Have Pari Passu Charge Only Over Properties Specifically Charged, Not All Assets; Workmen Have Priority for Uncharged Properties Under Sections 529 and 529A Companies Act, 1956.

1 Aug 2026

The dispute arose from the winding up of U.M.I. Special Steel Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956. The company became sick, an...

12 13 14 15 16

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)