Search Results for "order allowing counter claim"

860 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 860 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application for Adverse Inference and Denial of Cross-Examination in Commercial Suit. Trial Court's Discretion Upheld as No Perversity or Arbitrariness Shown Under Article 227 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Sivagami N., was the first defendant in a commercial suit (Com.OS 64/2022) pending before the LXXXV Additional City Civil and Sessions...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal, Upholds Arbitral Award Holding Husband Jointly and Severally Liable for Wife's Debit Balance in Stock Trading Account — Oral Contract for Joint Liability Falls Within Scope of BSE Bye-law 248(a) Arbitration Clause.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by AC Chokshi Share Broker Private Limited against the order of the Bombay High Court's division bench, whi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Telecom Company's Claim for Refund of Entry Fee After 2G Licences Quashed Due to Illegal Government Policy. Restitution Under Section 65 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 Denied as Quashing Did Not Render Contracts Void, and Set-Off Policy Upheld Under Article 14 of Constitution.

The dispute involved a telecom company seeking a refund of an Entry Fee of Rs 1454.94 crores paid for 2G licences across twenty-one service areas, aft...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Contractor's Appeal in ONGC Arbitration Dispute. Levy of Liquidated Damages Under Clause 2 of Contract Held Arbitrable, Not an Excepted Matter.

The Supreme Court of India heard two civil appeals arising from a judgment of the Delhi High Court Division Bench, which had set aside an arbitral awa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeal Against Remission of Arbitral Award for De Novo Consideration Due to Jurisdictional Error. Arbitrator Exceeded Jurisdiction by Entertaining Claims Not Raised Before Chief Engineer and Commissioner Under Contractual Pre-Arbitration Procedure.

The appellant, Biwater Penstocks Ltd., a UK-based company, entered into a contract with the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay (first respondent)...