Search Results for "objectors hearing"

176 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 176 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Multiple Appeals and Cross-Objections Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Challenging Enhanced Compensation for Railway Project Lands. Market Value Determination at Rs.39,20,400 per Acre by Reference Courts Contested as Inadequate by Landowners and Excessive by Railways.

These appeals and cross-objections arose from land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State for the South Central Railway in Mahagaon village, K...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Auction Purchaser's Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Interest Claim on Fixed Deposit in Execution Proceedings. Court holds that interest on fixed deposit cannot be claimed under Section 151 CPC without specific provision in the decree or order.

The petitioner, Sri S.R. Venkatesh Babu, was the auction purchaser of a portion of the subject property in Execution Petition No.2420/2002 pending bef...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Auction Purchaser's Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Interest Claim on Fixed Deposit in Execution Proceedings. Court Holds That Interest on Fixed Deposit Accrues to the Decree Holder, Not the Auction Purchaser, Under Section 151 CPC.

The petitioner, Sri S.R. Venkatesh Babu, was the auction purchaser of a portion of the subject property in Execution Petition No.2420/2002 pending bef...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Writ Petitions Against Delimitation of Wards in Mysuru and Tumakuru City Corporations Heard by High Court. Petitioners claimed violation of Section 21 of Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 and non-compliance with delimitation guidelines.

The judgment dealt with a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the delimitation of wards...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation for Injured Claimants. Tractor Accident Victim Awarded Rs.1,50,000 with 6% Interest for Fracture Injuries Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by Venkatesh and Neelamma, husband and wife, who sustained injuries in a tractor accident on 19.10.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation for Injured Claimants. Held that the Tribunal's assessment of compensation was just and proper, and the insurer is liable to pay the awarded amount.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by Venkatesh and Neelamma (claimants) seeking compensation for injuries sustained in a trac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Decides Regular First Appeal Arising from Dismissal of Suit for Declaration of Property Ownership. Property Originally Allotted to a Swamiji Under Mysore Government Scheme and Later Subject to Litigation Over Inheritance and Alleged Fraud.

The appeal arose from the dismissal of a suit for declaration of ownership of immovable property situated in Bangalore. The original plaintiff, C.R. H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Appeal and Allows Cross-Objection in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value Determined Based on Sale Deed of Similar Land.

The case pertains to land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Karnataka for a highway improvement project. The land belonging to Smt. Ka...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Constitutionality of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, Holding Procedure Not Discriminatory or Arbitrary. Provisions for Correction of Revenue Records and Consolidation Powers Not Violative of Articles 14 and 31(2) of the Constitution.

The proceedings concerned a challenge to the constitutional validity of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act (U.P. V of 1954) as amended by Act No. ...