Search Results for "notice under Section 321"

506 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 506 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Deductions Under Sections 80-IA and 80-HHC of Income Tax Act Without Restriction Under Section 80-IA(9) — Holds That Each Deduction Is Computed on Eligible Profits Separately and Cumulative Deduction Is Permissible Up to Gross Total Income.

The case involved a group of appeals concerning the interpretation of Section 80-IA(9) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, specifically whether an assessee w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Default Bail in POCSO Case Due to Non-Completion of Investigation Within 60 Days. Petitioner Enlarged on Bail Under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. as Charge Sheet Not Filed Within Statutory Period.

The petitioner, Moulali, was arrested on 03.12.2024 in connection with offences punishable under Sections 376(2)(n), 506 of IPC and Sections 4, 6, 8, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Default Bail in POCSO Case Due to Non-Completion of Investigation Within 60 Days. Petitioner Entitled to Default Bail Under Section 167(2) CrPC as Charge Sheet Filed After Expiry of 60 Days from First Remand.

The petitioner, Moulali, was arrested on 01.12.2024 in connection with offences punishable under Sections 376(2)(n), 506 of IPC and Sections 4, 6, 8, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Bail Petitions and Refers Questions on POCSO Act to Division Bench. Single Judge observes conflicting views on Section 35 compliance and refers issues regarding default bail and evidence recording under Section 164 Cr.P.C., doubting Vinay v. State of Karnataka.

The case involved two criminal petitions filed before the Karnataka High Court by the accused, Hanumantha Mogaveera, seeking bail under Section 439 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Apartment Construction in Residential Zone. Petitioners failed to prove zoning violation or need for environmental clearance; BBMP's approval upheld.

The petitioners, Sri. V. Dhamodaran and others, residents of Kaikondarahalli, Bangalore, filed writ petitions challenging the construction of an apart...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Society Members Challenging Arbitral Award for Lack of Locus Standi. Non-signatories to arbitration agreement cannot challenge award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, who are members of Apsara Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Ac...