Search Results for "non-application of mind"

443 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 443 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Material — Petitioner Externed Under Section 57(a)(i) of Bombay Police Act, 1951 Without Proper Consideration of In-Camera Statements and Old Convictions.

The petitioner, Mohammed Alam Ibrahim Shaikh @ Aalu, challenged an externment order passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Thane, under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Detention Order Under PIT-NDPS Act for Non-Application of Mind and Procedural Lapses. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside Due to Failure to Consider Pending Bail Application and Unexplained Delay in Forwarding Representation.

The petitioner, a Nigerian national, was detained under Section 3 of the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind. The court held that the detaining authority failed to consider the detenu's bail status and passed the order mechanically, violating the requirement of subjective satisfaction.

The petitioner, Shri Madhukar Mahadeo Manve, challenged the detention order dated 19th August 2004 passed under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under PASA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Procedural Lapses. Detenu's Preventive Detention Set Aside as Subjective Satisfaction Was Not Properly Recorded and Grounds of Detention Were Not Communicated in Time.

The petitioner, Nitin Bhimabhai Patel, was detained under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985 (PASA Act) by orders dated 14/03/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of District Judge for Non-Application of Mind and Violation of Natural Justice. Premature Retirement Order Set Aside as Review Committee Failed to Consider Entire Service Record and Adverse Remarks Were Not Communicated.

The Petitioner, a District Judge, challenged his compulsory retirement from service on attaining the age of 55 years, by an order dated 12/07/2018. He...