Search Results for "metro construction"

265 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 265 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Corrigendum Reducing Compensation under National Highways Act, 1956. Competent Authority Lacks Power to Review Award; Section 33 of Right to Fair Compensation Act Not Applicable Absent Notification Under Section 105(3).

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenged a corrigendum issued by the Competent Authority under the National Highways Act, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reverses High Court Order in Tender Dispute Involving Foreign Sovereign Funding. High Court Erred in Interfering with Technical Bid Rejection Under Article 226 as Project Funded by Japanese Loan with Non-Negotiable Terms Under Memorandum of Understanding.

The dispute arose from a tender process for the Mumbai-Ahmedabad High Speed Rail Project, where the National High Speed Rail Corporation Limited (NHSR...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Tender Award by MHADA — No Violation of Natural Justice Found. Bidder's Challenge to Summary Rejection of Technical Bid Fails as Evaluation Was Based on Tender Conditions and No Prejudice Was Caused.

The petitioners, ACC India Private Limited and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Land Acquisition for Road Widening; Upholds Validity Under Tamil Nadu Highways Act, 2001 Without Separate Notification

The dispute arose from the acquisition of land and buildings belonging to the appellants by the Tamil Nadu Highways Department for a road expansion pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Metro Construction Method as Withdrawn, Imposes Costs for Abuse of Process. Court finds the petition was filed with oblique motive to pressurize the developer for personal demands, not genuine public interest.

The petitioner, Dr. Monica Matani, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court complaining about the construction method ado...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 350 OF 2017

The case concerns two petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 14 February ...