Search Results for "marriage promise"

323 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 323 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Abetment of Suicide Case Due to Absence of Instigation or Physical Relationship. Promise to Marry Not Proven; Mere Refusal to Marry Does Not Amount to Abetment Under Section 306 IPC.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of the accused-appellant, Kamaruddin Dastagir Sanadi, against his conviction by the Karnataka High Court for offe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Consent of Minor Victim Not Valid, but Prosecution Failed to Prove Penetrative Sexual Assault Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ketan Sanjay Kokate, was convicted by the Special Judge, POCSO, Pune for offences under Section 376 IPC and Section 3 punishable under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Consent Vitiation. Promise to Marry Not Proven as Sole Basis for Sexual Relations Under Section 376 IPC.

The appellant, Jagdish Raghunath Mankar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Palghar, in Sessions Case No.256 of 1996 for the offence puni...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Husband and In-laws in Dowry Death Case Due to Hostile Witnesses and Lack of Evidence. Allegations of Demand of Rs. 50,000/- for Plot Not Proved; Suicide Note Does Not Implicate Accused.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of acquittal passed by the learned Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Washim in Sessions Trial No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping and Rape of Minor Based on Consistent Testimony and Medical Evidence. Promise of Marriage to a 12-13 Year Old Girl Constitutes False Promise Vitiating Consent Under Sections 363 and 376 IPC.

The appellant, Bhaiyya Subhash Panpatil, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, for offences under Sections 363 and 376 of the Indian ...