Search Results for "limitation extension"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "limitation extension"

1136 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1136 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator Despite Earlier Refusal to Extend Mandate Under Section 29A of Arbitration Act — Refusal to Extend Mandate Does Not Terminate Arbitral Proceedings or Bar Fresh Appointment Under Section 11.

1 Apr 2026

The case involves a dispute arising out of a Deed of Assignment of Development Rights dated 6 December 2010 between the applicants (Nalin Vallabhbhai ...

High Court

High Court Appoints Arbitrator in Dispute Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 After Previous Arbitrator's Withdrawal Due to Ill Health

12 Feb 2026

The High Court of Bombay heard two commercial arbitration applications filed by Applicants seeking appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Strikes Down Rule 90(3) of CGST Rules as Ultra Vires in Refund Re-Application Case. Rule 90(3) requiring fresh refund application within two years of relevant date held inconsistent with Section 54 of CGST Act, 2017.

10 Jan 2022

The petitioner, Saiher Supply Chain Consulting Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the constit...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Condonation of Delay in Excise Appeal — Petitioner's Application for Condonation of Delay Allowed as Sufficient Cause Shown for Delay of 30 Days in Filing Appeal Against Order of Commissioner of Excise. The court held that the Chief Secretary's rejection was too strict and not in consonance with the liberal approach to be adopted in condonation matters.

28 Feb 2014

The petitioner, M/s. Rhea Distilleries, a partnership firm, challenged an order dated 31/01/2013 passed by the Chief Secretary, Government of Goa, in ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Limitation of Liability Clause in Arbitration Case — Clause 49.5 Bars Damages for Employer Delay. Contractual prohibition on claiming damages for employer-caused delay held valid and enforceable under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

1 Jan 2025

The dispute arose from a construction contract between M/s. C & C Constructions Ltd. (appellant) and IRCON International Ltd. (respondent) for buildin...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Appeals Challenging Suo Motu Revision Orders Under KVAT Act. Appeals Raise Issues of Input Tax Credit Denial Based on Supplier's Registration Status, Limitation Period for Revision, and Mandatory Penalty Provisions.

7 Jul 2026

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Refusal to Accept Opposition to Trademark Registration Due to Delay. Section 21 of Trade Marks Act, 1999 Prescribes Mandatory Limitation Period of Three Months Plus One Month Extension, and Registrar Has No Power to Entertain Opposition Filed Beyond That Period.

27 Apr 2006

The petitioner, Sardar Gurudas Singh Bedi, trading as Volga Confectionary Works, sought to oppose the registration of the trademark 'Volga Ice Cream' ...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Arbitral Award in Favor of Oil Corporation in Kerosene Supply Contract Dispute. Arbitrator Had Rejected Limitation Defense Under Contractual Clause and Held Clause Not Void Under Section 28 of Indian Contract Act.

4 Mar 2015

The matter arose from an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the original respondent in the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Defendant in Commercial Suit to File Written Statement Despite Expiry of 120-Day Limit Due to COVID-19 Disruptions. Time Limit Under Proviso to Order VIII Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 as Substituted by Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Extended Considering Orders in Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3 of 2020 and Administrative Curtailment of Court Functioning.

14 Feb 2022

The dispute arose from a commercial suit filed by the plaintiff-respondent against the defendant-appellant for recovery of Rs. 3,73,24,821/- with inte...

Tribunals

NCLAT Clarifies Certified Copy Requirement for Filing Appeal Under Section 61 of IBC, 2016. The court held that an uncertified copy can be filed, but limitation runs from receipt of certified copy.

30 Nov -0001

This judgment arises from a reference made to a single member bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) at Chennai due to a dissent...

12 13 14 15 16

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)