Search Results for "liberal interpretation"

534 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 534 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case Due to Failure to Consider Evidence. Tribunal's Rejection of Compensation Claim Set Aside as Deceased Was a Bona Fide Passenger and Death Occurred Due to Accidental Fall from Train.

The appellants, sons of the deceased Dhondabai, filed a claim petition before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, seeking compensation for the death ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Railway Claims Tribunal Rejection of Compensation for Untoward Incident. Held that strict proof of boarding train is not required under Section 124-A of Railways Act, 1989 and the claimant's version must be accepted unless rebutted by strong evidence.

The appellant, Nitin Navindas Hundiwala, a 75-year-old consultant, filed a claim for compensation under Section 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989, read ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Return of Plaint in Specific Performance Suit, Holds Dispute Falls Within Commercial Dispute Definition. Agreement for Development of Land Involves Commercial Activity Under Section 2(1)(c)(vii) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015.

The petitioner, original defendant no.3(a) to 3(c) in a suit for specific performance of a development agreement dated 1st October 2014, filed a writ ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 43B(f) of Income Tax Act — Leave Encashment Deduction Allowed Only on Actual Payment. Clause (f) is not arbitrary or violative of Article 14 as it serves a legitimate purpose of preventing abuse and ensuring employee welfare.

The Supreme Court in this appeal considered the constitutional validity of clause (f) of Section 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which was inserted b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging POTA Sanction and Review Committee's Confirmation. Court upholds validity of sanction under Section 45 of POTA and affirms that POTA Review Committee has jurisdiction to confirm or revoke sanction under Section 60 of POTA.

The petitioners, who were accused in a case involving offences under the Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 (POTA) and the Unlawful Activities (Prevent...