APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.495 OF 2015
8 Mar 2016The judgment under consideration pertains to four appeals arising from a property dispute involving final plot no.267 of Town Planning Scheme IV, Mahi...
Search Results for "lawfully held"
1273 result(s) found
Found 1273 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Examines Constitutionality of Prohibitory Orders Under Section 144 CrPC Restricting Public Assembly. Judgment Clarifies That Reasonable Restrictions on Speech and Assembly Must Be Just, Fair and Reasonable Under Articles 19 and 21.
1 Aug 2026The Supreme Court initiated a suo motu criminal writ petition regarding the incident at Ramlila Maidan on 4-5 June 2011, involving the imposition of p...
- 41
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Review Petition Filed by Customs Department in Customs Act Case — DRI Officers Held as Proper Officers. The Court overruled earlier decisions and upheld Section 28(11) of the Customs Act, 1962 as constitutionally valid, restoring the Department's power to issue show cause notices.
13 Dec 2024The Supreme Court, in a batch of petitions led by Review Petition No. 400 of 2021, considered the correctness of its earlier judgment in M/s Canon Ind...
- 612
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Injunction in Property Dispute Over Passage and Gate. Trial Court Failed to Consider Leave Application Under Order II Rule 2 CPC Before Granting Interim Relief.
25 Jul 2006The appeal arises from a suit filed by Respondents 1 to 4 (plaintiffs) against the appellant (defendant No.1) and the Municipal Corporation (defendant...
- 43
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Blanket Prohibitory Order Under Section 144 CrPC in Bengaluru, Holds It Violative of Articles 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(b); Order Cancelling Protest Permissions Against CAA Struck Down as District Magistrate Failed to Apply Mind and Provide Material Facts.
13 Feb 2020The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions challenging an order dated 18 December 2019 issued by the District Magistrate-cum-Commissi...
- 25
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Quashing of Non-Compoundable Offences Based on Compromise in Matrimonial Dispute. The Court held that the High Court's inherent power under Section 482 CrPC can be exercised to quash proceedings for non-compoundable offences when parties have genuinely settled the dispute and the offence is not heinous or against society.
1 Jan 2020The appeal arose from a criminal case where the appellants were charged under Section 493 IPC and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act based on an...
- 377
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Demolition of Structures by Nashik Municipal Corporation Without Proper Notice and Hearing. Demolition Without Prior Notice Violates Principles of Natural Justice Under Section 53A of MRTP Act and Section 169 of MMC Act.
12 Sep 2024The judgment involves a group of writ petitions filed by individuals and businesses challenging the demolition of their structures by the Nashik Munic...
- 570
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint to Implead New Developer in Redevelopment Dispute — Plaintiff's Rights Under Debenture Trust Deed Require Complete Adjudication. The court held that the proposed amendment was necessary for complete and effectual adjudication and did not change the nature of the suit or introduce a new cause of action.
3 Sep 2024The plaintiff, Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited, filed a commercial suit against Meeti Developers Private Limited (defendant No.1) and o...
- 315
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Enforcement of Foreign Award Against NAFED in Groundnut Export Dispute — Government Refusal Does Not Excuse Breach Under FOSFA Contract. The court held that a canalizing agency cannot rely on its own lack of permission as a force majeure event under Clause 14 of the FOSFA 20 Contract, and enforcement of the award is not against public policy despite procedural irregularities.
22 Apr 2020The case involves a dispute between National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India (NAFED), a canalizing agency for the Government of...
- 212
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Mundkar Declaration — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interferable Under Article 226. The court upheld the declaration of respondents as Mundkars under the Goa, Daman and Diu Mundkars (Protection from Eviction) Act, 1975, finding no perversity in the concurrent findings of the Deputy Collector and Administrative Tribunal.
7 Jul 2014The petitioners, legal heirs of Krishna Vithoba Xete Tilve, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the High Court of Bomba...
- 84
