Search Results for "land acquisition lapse"

616 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 616 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition for Land Allotment Under Displaced Persons Act Due to Laches. Court Holds That Displaced Persons Act, 1954 Does Not Envisage Issuance of Orders by Custodian for Execution of Compensation Claims.

The petitioner, Chandru Mirchandani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court seeking a direc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Acquisition Notification for Lack of Public Purpose. Acquisition of Petitioners' Land for Archaeological Museum Set Aside as Notification Did Not Specify Public Purpose Under Section 4(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioners, Nidasheshi Veeranna and Gali Prakash, along with Gali Shivabasappa in the connected petition, owned agricultural lands in Sy.No.4/1 a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Quash Land Acquisition Proceedings Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Due to Lapse Under Section 24(2) of 2013 Act. Acquisition Lapsed as Possession Not Taken and Compensation Not Paid Despite Award Made in 2008.

The petitioners, Reliance Natural Resources Limited and its director Murli Manohar Purohit, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitutio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Petitioners in DCR Interpretation Case Following Supreme Court's Godrej & Boyce Ruling. The Court Holds That Paragraph 6 of Appendix VII Entitles Owner to DRC Equal to Area of Constructed Amenity, Rejecting Circulars Limiting to 25%.

Background: The consolidated writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay under Article 226 of the Constitution concerning ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Irrigation Project — Acquisition Proceedings Quashed for Non-Compliance with Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Failure to Make Award Within Two Years from Declaration Under Section 6 Renders Proceedings Lapsed.

The petitioner, Smt. Nilima Mahesh Bhole, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) seeking quashment of land acquisition ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Land Acquisition Challenges for Housing Scheme — Upholds Notifications Under Land Acquisition Act and Karnataka Housing Board Act. Petitioners failed to demonstrate any violation of statutory provisions or fundamental rights in acquisition for public purpose.

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by landowners challenging the acquisition of their lands for a housing scheme by the Karnataka H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reservation on Land Due to Mapping Error and Non-Acquisition. The court quashed the reservation on the petitioner's land as the reservation chart showed a different survey number and no acquisition steps were taken for decades.

The petitioner, an agriculturist aged 77, is a joint owner of agricultural land Gat No. 933 (Old Survey No. 212/1) admeasuring 15R. In 1981, responden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Public Purpose — Compensation Award Not Challenged on Merits. Petitioners' Challenge to Acquisition Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Fails as They Did Not Seek Reference for Higher Compensation and Acquiesced to Proceedings.

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original owner Anwar Hajee Alimohammed Hajee Cassum Agboatwala and other co-owners, filed a writ petition under Ar...