Search Results for "katha"

204 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 204 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Under Article 227 of Constitution of India Challenging 0Execution Order -- Judgment Debtors' Application Under Order XXI Rule 11 of CPC Rejected in Dispute Over Mediated Settlement and Default Clause Enforcement

The High Court of Karnataka dismissed a writ petition filed by judgment debtors challenging an execution order. The case involved a mediated settlemen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Demolition Under National Highways Act — Petitioner Failed to Establish Ownership of Property. Burden of proof lies on petitioner to establish ownership for maintainability of writ under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, SND Sampath, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Tribunal Order for Violation of Natural Justice in Tenancy Dispute. Failure to Consider Evidence and Provide Hearing Leads to Remand Under Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961.

The petitioners, legal representatives of the original applicant Narasappa, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Tribunal Order in Tenancy Dispute — Failure to Consider Evidence and Provide Opportunity of Hearing. Land Tribunal's order set aside for violating principles of natural justice and ignoring material evidence under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961.

The petitioners, legal representatives of the original applicant Narasappa, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that the second appellate court cannot re-appreciate evidence unless there is a perverse finding or substantial question of law under Section 100 of CPC.

The appellant, who was the defendant in the original suit, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular First Appeal in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Appeal fails as appellants failed to prove title and possession over suit property, and no substantial question of law arose.

The case involves a Regular First Appeal filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated 30.06.2015...