Search Results for "investigation detention period"

645 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 645 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Non-Application of Mind and Mechanical Confirmation. Detenu's representation not considered independently, violating Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 3(2) of Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1985.

The petitioner, Smt. Marry Usha, wife of the detenu Gnana Prakash, filed a writ petition for habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution of In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Parole Order for Convict in Culpable Homicide Case Due to Arbitrary Rejection and Delay in Execution. Rejection of permanent parole on ground of not applying for regular parole held unsustainable; delay in implementing High Court order violates Article 21.

The appellant, Daulal, was convicted for offences under Sections 148, 448, 304 Part II read with 149, and 323 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and sent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused No.2 in Cyber Crime Case Involving Cheating and Outraging Modesty of Woman. Petitioner enlarged on bail under Section 483 BNSS for offences under Sections 318(4), 319(2) BNS and 66(D) IT Act, subject to conditions.

The petitioner, Avinash, accused No.2 in Crime No.794/2024 registered by South East CEN Crime Police Station, Bengaluru City, filed a criminal petitio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Section 498A IPC as Constitutionally Valid but Issues Guidelines to Prevent Misuse. The court held that the provision is not unconstitutional but requires safeguards against misuse through directions on arrest, investigation, and compounding of offences.

The Supreme Court in this batch of writ petitions and appeals considered the constitutional validity of Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Default Bail Case Under UAPA — Extension of Custody Upheld Despite Procedural Defects. Report of Public Prosecutor Must Indicate Application of Mind, But Technical Non-Compliance Not Fatal When Substance Exists.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Maharashtra against the Bombay High Court's order granting default bail to the respondents/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition for Son's Release in CBI Case Due to Timely Filing of Charge-Sheet. Court holds that 90-day limit under Section 167(2) CrPC applies to offences punishable with imprisonment of 10 years or more, and charge-sheet filed within 90 days prevents default bail.

The petitioner, Rajkumar Bhagchand Jain, filed a writ of habeas corpus before the Bombay High Court seeking the release of his son, Rohit Jain, from j...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of the Constitution Violated as Statements of Co-Accused Not Supplied.

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Kirti Vanabhai Patel, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the detentio...