Search Results for "investigating agency obligation"

421 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 421 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Union of India's Appeal Against Grant of Default Bail Under UAPA — Right to Default Bail Accrues on Expiry of 90 Days from First Remand, Subsequent Filing of Charge Sheet Does Not Defeat Right.

The Union of India filed writ appeals against an order of a learned Single Judge granting default bail to the respondents under Section 167(2) of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail Granted by Calcutta High Court in Jnaneshwari Express Derailment Case — CBI Investigation Undermined by Premature Release. Reverse Burden of Proof Under Section 436A CrPC Not Applicable Where Investigation Ongoing and Trial Not Commenced.

The Supreme Court heard appeals by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) against the grant of bail to multiple accused persons in connection with ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Default Bail to Accused in MCOCA Case Due to Failure to File Charge Sheet Within 90 Days. Section 167(2) CrPC Entitles Accused to Indefeasible Right to Bail if Investigation Not Completed Within Statutory Period.

The appellants, nine individuals, were arrested in connection with Crime No. 179 of 2018 registered at Anandnagar Police Station, Osmanabad, for vario...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Legality of Customs Broker Licence Suspension Due to Delay in Submitting Inquiry Report. Interpretation of Regulation 20(5) of Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013 — Whether Time Limit of 90 Days for Inquiry Report is Mandatory or Directory.

A group of customs appeals was filed by the Principal Commissioner of Customs (General), Mumbai, against various customs broker licence holders before...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Rights of Trafficking Victims, Issues Guidelines for Rescue and Rehabilitation. Court Holds That State Must Take Reasonable Measures to Safeguard Right to Rehabilitation Under Article 21.

This Miscellaneous Application arose from a prior disposed Public Interest Litigation regarding human trafficking. The petitioner sought enforcement o...