Search Results for "incorrect particulars"

1002 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1002 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Batch of First Appeals in Land Acquisition Matters — No Outcome Provided. Multiple First Appeals Filed by State of Maharashtra, Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation, and Landowners Seeking Enhancement/Reduction of Compensation.

The judgment text provided only lists the title and case numbers of multiple First Appeals before the Bombay High Court, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Employee Retired Before Superannuation Age. Employer Failed to Prove Retirement Age of 58; Employee's Service Record Showed Superannuation Age of 60 Under Item 9 Schedule IV MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The case involves a writ petition filed by National Bicycle Corporation of India Ltd. (the employer) challenging an order of the Industrial Court date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Change of Opinion. Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Based on Mere Change of Opinion Without New Material is Invalid.

The petitioner, M/s. Rabo India Finance Limited, a non-banking financial company, challenged a notice dated 28.3.2011 issued under Section 148 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Tenant Defendants in Possession Suit, Sets Aside Injunction. Court holds that tenants in possession cannot be injuncted without a decree for possession, and a suit for injunction simpliciter is maintainable against a landlord.

The case involves two appeals arising from a common order of the Learned Single Judge dated 6th September 2021. The Appellant in Appeal No.551 of 2019...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Passes Order on Interim Plea Over Yes Bank Management Rights Claimed by Heirs of Ashok Kapur. Core Issue Involves Interpretation of Articles of Association Regarding Heritability of Co-founder's Defined Privileges Following His Death in 2008 Mumbai Terror Attacks.

The judgment deals with a Notice of Motion taken out by the legal heirs of late Ashok Kapur, co-founder of Yes Bank, who perished in the November 2008...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Appeal Under Section 14 of Admiralty Act Against Single Judge Order Dismissing Defendant's Notice of Motion. The dispute concerned breach of a bareboat charterparty and a subsequent time charterparty regarding a vessel.

The original plaintiff, Siem Offshore Rederi AS, a Norwegian company, filed Admiralty Suit (L) No. 20 of 2018 before the Bombay High Court against the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Winding-Up Order in Bond Default Case; Upholds Adverse Remarks Against Directors for Fund Diversion. Company Found Unable to Pay Debts and Substratum Lost, Justifying Winding Up Under Sections 433(e) and 433(f) of Companies Act, 1956.

The appeal arose from a winding-up order passed by the learned company Judge against Zenith Infotech Limited (the appellant) in a petition filed by Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Appeals by Aggregators and Bike Taxi Owners Against State’s Refusal to Grant Permits for Bike Taxi Services. Dispute Centers on Whether Motorcycle Owners Are Entitled to Render Bike Taxi Services Under the Motor Vehicles Act and Karnataka Rules.

The case comprised five writ appeals filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, challenging a common order dated 02.04.2025 passed b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal to Enforce English Summary Judgment in Guarantee Dispute — Foreign Judgment Held Unenforceable for Violating Principles of Natural Justice Under Section 13 CPC. Summary judgment passed after denying leave to defend is not conclusive and cannot be enforced in India.

The dispute arose from a Share Purchase and Co-operation Agreement (SPCA) executed on 12.05.1995 between (appellant, a foreign company) and (responden...