Search Results for "illegal import"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "illegal import"

1018 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1018 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Sales Tax Dispute Over Time Charter Agreement — Holds That Time Charter Is a Service Contract, Not Transfer of Right to Use Goods. The Court ruled that a time charter does not involve transfer of possession or control, thus not taxable under Section 5C of Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957.

4 Dec 2019

The appellant, The Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd., owned a tug named 'Kumari Tarini' and entered into a Time Charter Agreement dated 8.1.1998 with th...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Show Cause Notice in GST Case for Lack of Jurisdiction and Violation of Natural Justice. Show Cause Notice Issued by Additional Commissioner Without Proper Authorization and Without Providing Relevant Documents Set Aside.

28 Nov 2024

The petitioner, M/s. Vigneshwara Transport Company, a proprietor engaged in transportation of goods and registered under the Central Goods and Service...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Importer of Alcoholic Beverages Against Refusal of NOC by FSSAI for Wine Containing Tartaric Acid and Ascorbic Acid. The court held that these additives are permitted under the Food Safety and Standards (Food Products Standards and Food Additives) Regulations, 2011, and directed release of the consignments.

28 Jul 2015

The Petitioner, M/s Pernod Ricard India P. Ltd., a company engaged in manufacturing, selling, and importing alcoholic beverages including the wine bra...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Communication Rejecting Coal Import Tender Bid as Non-Responsive for Arbitrary Reasons. Subsidiary Company Cannot be Disqualified Based on Parent Company’s Contract Termination When Tender Conditions Do Not Explicitly Bar Reliance on Parent’s Experience, Under Article 14 of the Constitution.

29 Jan 2024

The petitioner, a subsidiary company engaged in coal import and supply, challenged a communication by the Karnataka Power Corporation Limited rejectin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Whether Notification 14/2010-ST is Clarificatory for Service Tax on Drilling Rigs in Continental Shelf. Appeal Admitted on Questions of Territorial Applicability of Service Tax to Offshore Drilling Services Under Finance Act, 1994.

28 Apr 2015

The appellant, M/s. Greatship (India) Ltd., entered into contracts with ONGC in February and May 2009 to provide offshore drilling services using hire...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses PIL Challenging State's Interpretation of Supreme Court Order Allowing Post-Deadline Transportation. The Petitioner Contends That the Supreme Court's Order Under Article 142 Permitted Only Excavation Till 15 March 2018 and Not Post-Deadline Transportation.

4 May 2018

The Goa Foundation, a public interest organization, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging the State Government's decisi...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Toddy Shop Owners' Challenge to Government Resolution Requiring 1000 Palm Trees for Licence — Condition Upheld as Reasonable to Prevent Adulteration. Court Rules That Licence Renewal Under Maharashtra Toddy Shops (Grant of Licences by Auction-cum-Tender) Order, 2001 Is Discretionary and State Policy Change Is Permissible.

20 Mar 2017

The dispute arose from writ petitions filed by toddy shop owners in Mumbai challenging a Government Resolution dated 28 October 2016 that imposed a re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR and Charge-Sheet in Insecticide Act Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Invalid Complaint. The court held that the complaint was not filed by a duly authorized Insecticide Inspector and no valid sanction was obtained under Section 31 of the Insecticide Act, 1968.

15 Oct 2025

The applicant, Tajraj s/o Yadorav Chavhan, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quashing of FIR No. 0244/2023...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Gold (Control) Act, 1968 with Partial Striking Down. Court holds delegation of power to Administrator not excessive and applies severability doctrine to sever ultra vires provisions.

30 Apr 1969

The case arose from a constitutional challenge to the Gold (Control) Act, 1968, enacted to curb gold smuggling and control internal gold transactions ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Application Seeking Clarification on Wildlife Protection Advisory - Upholds Amnesty Scheme and Immunity from Prosecution. Court held that Advisory dated 11.06.2020 remains valid as amnesty scheme under Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, and declarants are immune from prosecution under Amendment Act due to constitutional prohibition on retroactive criminal legislation under Article 20(1).

27 Mar 2023

The Supreme Court of India dismissed a miscellaneous application seeking clarification of its earlier order dated 08.08.2022 regarding the Wildlife (P...

12 13 14 15 16

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)