Search Results for "corruption charges"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "corruption charges"

893 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 893 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reinstates Dismissed Employee in Service Law Case Due to Violation of Natural Justice and Prejudice from Criminal Acquittal. Departmental Proceedings Were Quashed as Denial of Cross-Examination and Identical Charges Post-Acquittal Rendered the Dismissal Order Legally Unsustainable Under Principles of Natural Justice and Administrative Law.

23 Apr 2025

The dispute involved a constable in the Crime Investigation Department (CID) who was dismissed from service following departmental proceedings initiat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

22 Aug 2023

The appellant, Ambadas s/o Ramaji Sahare, was convicted by the Special Judge, Wardha in Special Case No.3/1996 for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Independent Witnesses and Unreliable Trap Proceedings. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

5 Feb 2020

The appellant, G B Jagadeesh, was convicted by the Special Judge, Davanagere, in Spl.C.(Lokayukta) No.9/2007 for offences under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses State Appeal in Corruption Case — Acquittal Upheld Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

18 May 2017

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 29.11.2003 passed by the Special Judge and Additional Sessions Judge, Akola, in...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Charges Against Journalists in Sting Operation Case — No Prima Facie Case Under Prevention of Corruption Act. Journalists posing as representatives of a company to expose corruption in public life does not constitute an offence under Section 12 of the PC Act or Sections 120-B, 114, 419 read with 34 IPC.

18 Nov 2016

The petitioners, Mahendra Mishra (Director of TV-9 Karnataka), L.R. Shrehas, and Shwetha Prabhu (news reporters), were arraigned as accused in Spl.C.C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Sub-Inspector and Private Individual in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole trap witness was a stock witness and evidence lacked corroboration.

8 Mar 2016

The appellants, Jawansingh Ramsingh Gaud (a Sub-Inspector of Police) and Umesh Manohar Ambre (a private individual), were convicted by the Special Jud...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Tax Superintendent in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

14 Mar 2012

The appellant, Vijaykumar Marotrao Daiwalkar, was a Tax Superintendent in the Municipal Council, Chandrapur. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Ch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Tax Superintendent in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

14 Mar 2012

The appellant, Vijaykumar Marotrao Daiwalkar, was a Tax Superintendent in the Municipal Council, Chandrapur. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Ch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 161 IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 set aside as demand of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

20 Jan 2006

The appellants, Deepak Ramgirwar and Vinayak Wakhre, were convicted by the Special Judge, Wardha for offences under Section 161 read with Section 34 o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act for Specific Act of Bribery Despite Absence of Sanction for Habitual Bribery Charge. Sanction Granted Under Section 6 for Offence Under Section 5(1)(d) Does Not Invalidate Trial Where Sanction for Section 5(1)(a) Was Lacking.

25 Oct 1957

Background: The case involved an appeal against a conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, raising the issue of whether a trial for tw...

12 13 14 15 16

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)