Search Results for "convict leave"

891 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 891 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence — Conviction Set Aside Due to Gaps in Chain of Circumstances. Failure to Prove Motive and Last Seen Theory Beyond Reasonable Doubt Leads to Benefit of Doubt Under Indian Penal Code, 1860 Sections 302, 201, 120B.

The appellant, Vrishal Madhukar Kalane, was convicted by the trial court under Sections 302, 201, and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for the mur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Furlough Leave to Life Convict Despite Adverse Police Report and Pending Case. Holds that Furlough is a Right, Not a Privilege, and Rejection Must Be Based on Valid Grounds Under Prison Rules.

The petitioner, Dinesh s/o Ashokrao Athawale, was convicted in Sessions Trial No.302/2014 for offences under Sections 302, 147, 148, 149, and 307 of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction but Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment in Rape and Murder Case — Circumstantial Evidence Sufficient for Conviction but Case Does Not Fall in 'Rarest of Rare' Category

The case pertains to the confirmation of death sentence awarded to Anil Jagannath Pawar by the Additional Sessions Judge, Shrirampur, in Sessions Case...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Convict's Petition Challenging Rejection of Furlough Leave Due to Previous Overstay. Furlough Leave Denial Upheld as Convict Had Previously Overstayed by 1103 Days, Rendering Him Ineligible for Further Furlough.

The petitioner, Gajanan Eknath Murle, a life convict undergoing imprisonment for murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, filed a Criminal W...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Compensation for Alleged Illegal Detention — Mistaken Release Date Corrected Before Actual Release. The court held that a mistaken intimation of release date does not render subsequent detention illegal if the error is rectified before the actual release.

The petitioner, Suryakant @ Bandu Ranoji Andekar, filed a criminal writ petition seeking a declaration that his detention in Yerawada Central Prison f...