Search Results for "competent authority jurisdiction"

7584 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7584 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award in Favour of Decree-Holder Against Judgment-Debtors. Court Rejects Objections Under Section 48 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Including Public Policy, Non-Arbitrability, Fraud, Limitation, and Res Judicata.

The applicant, Integrated Sales Services Limited, a Hong Kong-based company, obtained a foreign arbitral award dated 28 March 2010 from an Internation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Forum Conveniens Objection in Writ Petition Against Tribunal's Pre-Deposit Waiver Refusal. Developer Challenges Order Requiring Deposit Under Section 43(5) of RERA Act While Flat Purchaser Objects to Principal Seat Jurisdiction.

The writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenged the order dated 7 April 2021 of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Trib...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Under National Highways Act, 1956 for Lack of Personal Hearing. Compensation Determination Set Aside Due to Non-Compliance with Section 3G(2) Requiring Hearing Before Fixing Amount.

The petitioners, owners of land in Nagpur, challenged the acquisition of their land for the construction of a national highway under the National High...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Constitution Bench Examines Applicability of Part I of Arbitration Act, 1996 to Foreign-Seated Arbitrations. Reference Arises from Conflicting Views in Bhatia International and Venture Global Engineering.

The Supreme Court of India, by a reference order dated 16 January 2008, directed the listing of Civil Appeal No. 7019 of 2005 and connected matters be...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction of Tenant for Unauthorized Subletting and Misuse of Premises Under MHADA Act. Tenant failed to prove lawful sub-tenancy and used residential premises for commercial purposes, violating terms of allotment.

The petitioner, Dr. Ashok Trivikram Wagle, was a tenant of a residential premises owned by the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHA...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to SAFEMA Forfeiture Order — Agricultural Land Acquired Prior to Detention Exempt from Forfeiture. Property acquired before the 'illegal' period under Section 2(2)(b) of SAFEMA cannot be forfeited; appellate authority's order partly confirmed.

The petitioner, Ranchhodbhai Bhagwanbhai Tandel (since deceased, through his legal heir Naresh Ranchhodbhai Tandel), filed a criminal writ petition un...