Search Results for "communication gap"

314 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 314 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence of Gang Leader in MCOCA Kidnapping and Murder Case. Conviction under MCOCA and IPC for kidnapping for ransom and murder upheld, but co-accused's death sentence commuted to life imprisonment due to lesser role.

The judgment arises from a confirmation case and appeals against the conviction and death sentence of five accused persons under the Maharashtra Contr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Reinstatement Order in Voluntary Resignation Case — Workman Failed to Prove Coercion. Resignation Letter and Acceptance Established Voluntary Cessation of Service, Not Retrenchment Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, Vidyamandir Trust, challenged the award dated 31.8.2023 passed by the Labour Court, Palanpur in Reference (LCP) No. 50 of 2020. The re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Medical Corroboration. Conviction under Section 4 of POCSO Act and Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Case Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of Dr. Ramesh under Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows State's Petition to Quash Trial Court Order Dismissing Police Application Under Section 10 of KCOCA. Court Holds That Sanction Under Section 10 Is Not Required for Investigation, Only for Prosecution.

The State of Karnataka, through the Mangaluru East (Kadri) Police Station, filed three criminal petitions under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Trial Court's Refusal to Allow Additional Documents in Eviction Suit — No Error in Exercise of Discretion Under Order 13 Rule 1 CPC.

The petitioners, as plaintiffs in a suit for eviction, sued two defendants. The second defendant, during his cross-examination, applied to produce cer...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to MMRDA in Metro Fare Dispute Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act. Court restrains Mumbai Metro One from revising fares higher than government-notified rates pending arbitration.

The Bombay High Court was hearing an arbitration petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the Mumbai Metropoli...