Search Results for "commercial execution petition"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "commercial execution petition"

1687 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1687 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition in Part Regarding Stamp Duty on Arbitral Award in Execution Proceedings — Directs Payment of Proper Stamp Duty and Penalty Under Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957. The court held that stamp duty on an arbitral award is payable at the rate applicable on the date of the award, not the date of execution petition, and the decree-holder is liable to pay the same.

28 Jul 2023

The case involves two writ petitions arising from execution proceedings in Com.Ex.Pet.No.224/2021 before the LXXXVII Addl. City Civil and Sessions Jud...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Protection to Petitioners in Commercial Arbitration Petition Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act. Exclusive Rights to Manufacture Ice Cream Under 'Vadilal' Brand in Designated Territories Preserved Pending Arbitration Arising from 1993 Family Settlement.

30 Jun 2026

Shailesh R. Gandhi, Bela S. Gandhi, and Vadilal Dairy International Limited (formerly Super Milk Makers Private Limited) filed a petition under Sectio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commercial Arbitration Dispute. Court upholds award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy.

22 Jul 2026

The petitioner, Ramakrishnan Krishnan, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Delivers Oral Judgment in Commercial Appeal No. 38 of 2017: Appeal Against Single Judge’s Order Setting Aside Arbitral Award under MSMED Act. Issues of Limitation, Mis-joinder of Causes of Action, and Territorial Jurisdiction Raised in Challenge to Award for Interest on Delayed Payments.

31 Aug 2017

The appellant, M/s. Delton Electricals, a partnership firm and small scale industrial unit, filed Original Application No. 1 of 2005 before the Micro ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Order Referring Dispute to Arbitration in Commercial Suit — Arbitration Agreement Not Duly Signed by Plaintiff. Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 requires existence of valid arbitration agreement; mere reference in invoices insufficient.

8 Jul 2025

The petitioner, M/s. Tusker Workspace Pvt. Ltd., filed a commercial suit (Com. O.S. No.207/2024) before the LXXXVI Additional City Civil and Sessions ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956 for Debt Disputed in Good Faith. Petition Filed to Exert Pressure for Unreasonable Demands, Not for Recovery of Genuine Debt.

7 Jun 2006

The petitioner, Fomento Resorts And Hotels Ltd., filed a winding up petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 against the respondent, G...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Examines Challenge to Commercial Court’s Dismissal of Section 34 Petitions Upholding Arbitral Awards on Escalation Claims. Dispute Arises Out of Delays in Five Hospital Renovation Projects Undertaken by Contractor and Alleged Breach of Contract by Government Entities.

19 Sep 2024

The appellant, a contractor, was the successful bidder for 14 projects relating to the renovation and expansion of various government hospitals in Kar...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal to Enforce English Summary Judgment in Guarantee Dispute — Foreign Judgment Held Unenforceable for Violating Principles of Natural Justice Under Section 13 CPC. Summary judgment passed after denying leave to defend is not conclusive and cannot be enforced in India.

1 Jan 2026

The dispute arose from a Share Purchase and Co-operation Agreement (SPCA) executed on 12.05.1995 between (appellant, a foreign company) and (responden...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Appeals Filed Against Single Judge Order in Land Acquisition Matters Involving KIADB. Appeals Challenge Order Dated 04.07.2025 in Various Writ Petitions Filed by Landowners and Developers.

29 Jul 2026

...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Addresses Requirement of Leave Under Section 446 of Companies Act, 1956 and Applicability of IBC Moratorium in Admiralty Proceedings. Court Considers Whether Admiralty Suits Are Affected by Company Liquidation Under Section 446 of Companies Act, 1956 and Moratorium Under Section 14 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 in Light of Competing Claims of Maritime Creditors and Operation of Insolvency Law.

19 May 2020

The proceedings arose from multiple admiralty suits filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, wherein orders of arrest of defendant vessels...

12 13 14 15 16

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)