Search Results for "building regularization"

136 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 136 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Cancellation of Occupancy Rights in Inam Land of Temple. Land Tribunal's Order Granting Occupancy Rights Was Without Jurisdiction as Land Was Exempt Under Section 132 of Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Sri S.S. Kumaraswamy, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation Seeking Demolition of Illegal Construction on Khajuria Lake and Restoration of Water Body. Municipal Corporation and State Directed to Recover Costs from Erring Officers and Initiate Prosecution for Unauthorized Filling of 100-Year-Old Lake.

The petitioner, an Indian citizen and resident of Mumbai, filed a Public Interest Litigation seeking directions to demolish illegal construction on CT...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Labour Court Award Directing Reinstatement of Workman as Regular Sub-Staff in Industrial Dispute Case. Termination Without Reason and Non-Implementation of Settlement Justify Regularisation as Fresh Appointment.

The petitioner, Bank of India, challenged the award dated 21.12.2016 passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Bangalore,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Dental College Trust Seeking Admission After Cut-Off Date. Central Government permission communicated after 30 September 2014 cut-off cannot be used for admissions in that academic year.

The petitioners, a trust and a dental school, applied in 2011 to establish a dental college with 100 student intake. The State Government issued an es...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Policy for Section 351 Notices Under MCGM Act as Moot Due to Prior Challenge by BSE. The court held that the petitioner lacked locus standi and the issues were already pending before a Single Bench in a related writ petition.

The petitioner, Dr. V. Aditya Srinivas, an office bearer of BSE Brokers' Forum, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Bombay High Court seek...