Search Results for "bail tree"

144 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 144 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Murder and Conspiracy Case Under IPC Sections 120B and 302 Read with 34 Due to Insufficient Evidence and Inconsistencies. Appeals Allowed Setting Aside Trial Court Conviction

The High Court of Karnataka allowed criminal appeals filed by five accused persons, acquitting them of charges under Section 120B of IPC for conspirac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt under Sections 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Gujarat appealed against the acquittal of Jethabhai Manjibhai Hadiyal, a Talati-cum-Mantri, from charges under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Sakre Bosaiah, was convicted by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Chitradurga, in Sessions Case No. 53/2009 for offences under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Accused in Abetment of Suicide Case — No Prima Facie Case of Instigation. Allegations of harassment by Block Education Officer did not meet the threshold of abetment under Section 306 IPC as there was no direct or indirect instigation to commit suicide.

The petitioner, Hanamantraya, was the Block Education Officer (B.E.O.) of Sindagi and was arrayed as Accused No.3 in Crime No.37/2023 registered at Si...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Assault and Wrongful Confinement Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 324 and 342 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Puttasiddamma @ Puttasiddi and Samandaiah, were convicted by the I-Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Mandya in S.C.No.50/2013 for off...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Forest Act Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Conviction under Section 104-A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 set aside as prosecution failed to prove illegal transportation of sandalwood beyond reasonable doubt.

The petitioners, four individuals, were convicted by the Trial Court (Civil Judge and JMFC, Bhadravathi) in C.C. No. 5462/2006 for an offence under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in POCSO Case for Kidnapping and Rape of Minor — Victim's Consistent Testimony and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Prove Offences Under Sections 363, 366A, 376(2) IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act, 2012.

The appellant, Devanand Rajabhau More, was convicted by the Special Court, Ambajogai, in Special POCSO Case No. 4/2014 for offences under Sections 363...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Discharge of Accused in MCOCA Case Due to Invalid Sanction. Sanction Under Section 23(2) MCOCA Found to Be Without Application of Mind, Leading to Discharge of All Accused.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against an order dated 8th August 2014 passed by the Special Judge under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 304 Part II IPC for Causing Death by Rash Act, Reduces Sentence to Period Already Undergone. Appellant's Sentence Reduced as He Was Young and Had Already Served Long Incarceration Period.

The appellant, Gaffar Khan, was convicted by the trial court for the offence punishable under Section 304 Part II of the Indian Penal Code and sentenc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 397 IPC set aside as sole witness identification was doubtful and no recovery of weapon or stolen property was made.

The appellants, Balu @ Meghanand Punamchand Meshram and Sandeep Digambar Wasnik, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati, for the of...