KAHC010822332025_1
8 Jul 2026The Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka heard two intra-court writ appeals filed by M/s MP24 Construction Company, the lead member of a cons...
Search Results for "award quashing"
1012 result(s) found
Found 1012 result(s)
High Court
High Court Allows Employee's Petition in Industrial Dispute, Modifying Labour Court Award to Grant Continuity of Service and Retirement Benefits. Labour Court's Lumpsum Compensation Set Aside as Termination Violated Sections 25G and 25H of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Due to Employer's Failure to Produce Muster-Rolls and Seniority List.
29 Jan 2026The dispute arose from an industrial matter where the petitioner, an employee terminated by the respondent irrigation department, challenged the Labou...
- 379
High Court
High Court Allows Employee's Petition in Industrial Dispute, Modifying Labour Court Award to Grant Continuity of Service for Retirement Benefits. The Court found termination violated Sections 25F, 25G, and 25H of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, due to employer's failure to produce muster rolls, and followed precedent from similar cases confirmed by the Division Bench.
29 Jan 2026The dispute arose from an industrial matter where the petitioner, a workman employed by the irrigation department, was terminated from service. He cha...
- 261
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Landowners' Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Compensation and Betterment Charges for CIDCO Metro Project. Court upholds compensation determined under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 and rejects waiver of betterment charges under CIDCO Act.
4 Mar 2025The judgment pertains to a group of five writ petitions filed by landowners whose lands were acquired for the Metro Centre project of CIDCO in Panvel,...
- 763
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Non-Qualified Bidder Challenging Tender Award in Outsourcing Contract. Petitioner lacked locus standi as it was not qualified in technical bid.
24 Feb 2022The petitioner, Kolhapur Vidyut Apprentice Swayam Rojgar Sahakari Sanstha Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India c...
- 24
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Award of Composite Works Contract to MSE Bidder, Holds Public Procurement Policy Inapplicable to Works Contracts. Composite Tender for Firefighting System Involving Design, Supply, and Erection is a Works Contract Not Covered Under Section 11 of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006.
25 Jul 2017The dispute arose from a tender floated by Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL), a public sector undertaking, for a comprehensive firefi...
- 10
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Insurer Liable Despite Policy Commencing After Accident Time. Policy effective from 15/06/2006 covers accident on 14/06/2006 at 20:45 hrs as policy commences from midnight, and insurer cannot escape liability under Section 147 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
22 Jun 2017The case arises from a motor accident claim where the original claimant (since deceased) sought compensation for injuries sustained in a vehicular acc...
- 49
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Broking Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be Contrary to Public Policy or Suffering from Patent Illegality.
10 Jun 2013The petitioner, Bombay Construction and Engineering Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challen...
- 59
High Court
Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Violation of Natural Justice and Failure to Consider Evidence. The court held that the arbitrator's failure to consider the contractor's evidence and counter-claim, and the award being unreasoned, rendered the award patently illegal and in conflict with public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
24 Sep 2012The petitioner, M/s. Pancham International, a contractor, was appointed by the Union of India (Respondent No.1) for supply of bush shirts, pants, and ...
- 46
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition for Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Due to Lack of Locus Standi. Petitioner Failed to Prove Ownership or Possession of the Acquired Land Under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
30 Nov -0001The case involves a writ petition filed by Fakhruddin s/o Hyderali (since deceased, represented by his legal heir Mustafa Fakhruddin Ambawala) challen...
- 54
