Search Results for "additional pension"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "additional pension"

647 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 647 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Senior Clerk for Bribery in Pension Case, Acquits Head Clerk Due to Lack of Demand Proof. Accused No.2 convicted under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for demanding and accepting Rs.2000 bribe for processing pension proposal.

19 Jul 2024

The case involves two appeals arising from a common judgment of the Special Judge (Anti-Corruption), Pune, in Special Case No.53 of 2015. The State of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Pension to University Employee with 33 Years of Service Despite Temporary Appointments and Breaks. Continuous Service Under Rule 33 of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, Includes Temporary Service Followed by Confirmation.

18 Jul 2024

The petitioner, a chemistry teacher, served Savitribai Phule Pune University from 1993 until her retirement on 30 April 2016, completing over 33 years...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tata Memorial Centre's Petitions Challenging Industrial Court's Finding on Appropriate Government. State Government Held as Appropriate Government for Autonomous Body Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971, Making Union's Complaint Maintainable.

20 Mar 2024

The Bombay High Court dismissed four writ petitions filed by Tata Memorial Centre (TMC) challenging decisions of the Industrial Court, Mumbai, which h...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Pay Revision Discrimination Case Against Maharashtra State Financial Corporation - Fixation of Cut-off Date for Fifth Pay Commission Benefits to Retired Employees Held Arbitrary Under Article 14 of the Constitution. The court ruled that denying benefits to employees who retired between 01.01.2006 and 29.03.2010, while granting retrospective benefits from 01.01.2006 to those in service on 29.03.2010, constitutes hostile discrimination as all formed a homogenous class during the revision period.

2 Feb 2023

The Supreme Court heard an appeal concerning the fixation of a cut-off date for implementing Fifth Pay Commission recommendations for employees of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Retired University Employees' Writ Petitions for Pension Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982. University employees who retired before adoption of Defined Contribution Pension Scheme are entitled to pension as per pre-amendment rules.

10 Mar 2022

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by retired employees of Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Agriculture University, Parbhani, seeking pensionary...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Scheduled Caste Employee in Service Discrimination Case — Administrative Order Setting Aside District Judge's Decision Quashed. Court Restores Seniority and Promotion to Petitioner, Holding That Caste-Based Discrimination in Public Employment Violates Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

21 Aug 2017

The petitioner, Dashrath Gangaram Gorme, was appointed as an English Section Writer on 29/12/1982 on the establishment of the District & Sessions Judg...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions of JTOs Challenging Promotion Policy for Training Officers. The court upheld the validity of the Karnataka Government Servants (Seniority) Rules, 1957 and the promotion policy based on seniority-cum-merit.

7 Mar 2017

The petitioners, who are Junior Training Officers (JTOs) in various Government Industrial Training Institutes (ITIs) in Karnataka, challenged the prom...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Widow's Claim for Family Pension Despite Husband's Resignation — Resignation Does Not Forfeit Family Pension Under BSNL Pension Rules, 2007. Family pension is a separate benefit not affected by Rule 44(2) forfeiture clause.

7 Jul 2016

The petitioner, Kalpana Bachhav, is the widow of Vinayak Tryambak Bachhav, who was employed as a T.M. (Telecom Mechanic) with Bharat Sanchar Nigam Lim...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Appeal in Pension Benefit Case — Additional Pension Payable from Date of Attaining 80 Years, Not from Date of Government Order. The Court upheld the Single Judge's order granting additional pension to a retired Assistant Engineer from the date he attained 80 years, rejecting the Corporation's contention that he was ineligible until that date.

16 Dec 2015

The Hubballi-Dharwad Municipal Corporation appealed against an order of a Single Judge of the High Court of Karnataka allowing a writ petition filed b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows EPF Withdrawal Claims by Retired Employees Despite Delay — Limitation Not Applicable to Claims Under Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. The court held that the right to withdraw provident fund is a continuing right and cannot be defeated by the employer's failure to deposit contributions or by delay in filing claims.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by retired employees, Durgasri Srinivas Kallakuri and Amit Gunvantrai Mehta, against the Employees' Pro...

12 13 14 15 16

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)