Search Results for "accomplice evidence"

224 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 224 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case — Demand and Acceptance Not Proved. Sanction Held Invalid Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondent (accused), a Forest Guard, in Special Criminal Case No.1/2008 by the Additio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Secretary in Forgery Case Involving Forged Signatures on Society Documents. Concurrent findings of fact based on expert evidence and witness testimony not interfered with in revision.

The applicant, Pundlik Vishvanath Bangadkar, was the Secretary of Ganesh Shikshan Sanstha, Bhendra. The complainant, Anandrao Wanjari, was the Preside...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Minor Under Section 376(2)(i) IPC and POCSO Act. Testimony of Prosecutrix Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence and Prompt FIR.

The appellant, Ranjit Ghutke, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for the rape of a 13-year-old girl under Section 376(2)(i) o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Subhash s/o Narayanraoji Rathod, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, in Special Case No. 4/1997 for offences under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Head Constable in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Baliram s/o Mansingh Chawhan, a Police Head Constable, was convicted by the Special Judge, Washim in Special Case No. 3/1998 for offenc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Pardon Order in Sessions Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 307 CrPC — Pardon Granted Without Recording Reasons or Considering Accused's Objections.

The petitioner, Nagnath s/o Rajaram Ghuge, was the accused in Sessions Case No. 41/2010 pending before the Additional Sessions Judge, Ambajogai, for o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The case involves an appeal against conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellants, Pandit Shankar Chaudhari and Subhash Kitk...