Search Results for "VAT Department"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "VAT Department"

212 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 212 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses RTI Petition Seeking GST Returns of Third Parties — Information Denied as Personal and Confidential Under Section 8(1)(j) of RTI Act, 2005. The court held that GST returns filed by firms are personal information relating to commercial confidence and trade secrets, and disclosure requires consent or proof of larger public interest.

14 Oct 2025

The petitioner, Adarsh S/o Gautam Pimpare, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad challenging orders passed by the Jan Mahit...

High Court

High Court Dismisses RTI Petition Seeking GST Returns of Third Parties — Information Held Confidential Under Section 8(1)(j) of RTI Act, 2005. Disclosure of commercial tax returns of six firms denied as personal information not related to any public activity.

14 Oct 2025

The petitioner, Adarsh S/o Gautam Pimpare, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, challenging order...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging GST Assessment Orders for Violation of Natural Justice. Orders set aside as no opportunity of hearing was granted before ex-parte assessment under Section 73 of MGST Act, 2017.

16 Sep 2025

The petitioner, Esquire Electronics, a proprietorship firm represented by its proprietor Shri Jagdish Purohit, filed two writ petitions before the Bom...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Stay on Interest Demand in MVAT Case — Tribunal Erred in Treating Composite Order as Non-Appealable Under Section 30(2). The court held that an appellate order confirming interest under Section 30(2) of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002, when part of a composite assessment order, is appealable and stay can be granted.

6 Jun 2023

The petitioner, S. K. Trading Co., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 30 Septemb...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Property Tax Levy by Panvel Municipal Corporation on Kharghar Node. Petitioners Lacked Locus Standi and Failed to Exhaust Statutory Remedy of Appeal Under Section 406 of Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949.

6 Apr 2023

The petitioners, Kharghar Co-op. Housing Societies Federation and an individual resident, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal in VAT Case — Reassessment Order Set Aside Due to Lack of Proper Notice. The court held that the revisional authority exceeded its jurisdiction under Section 64(2) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 by setting aside the appellate order without issuing a show cause notice to the assessee.

19 Feb 2015

The appellant, M/s Sharma Furniture and Interior Decorator, filed appeals under Section 66(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 against an or...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Service Tax on Renting of Hotels and Restaurants. Sub-clauses (ZZZZV) and (ZZZZW) of Section 65(105) of Finance Act, 1994 as amended by Finance Act, 2011 held to be within legislative competence of Parliament.

3 Nov 2014

The case involves three writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the Karnataka High Court. The petitioners ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Revenue's Revision Petition in Input Tax Credit Dispute Under KVAT Act — Input Tax Credit Denied for Purchases from Unregistered Dealers. The court held that input tax credit is not available for purchases from unregistered dealers under Section 9(2)(b) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, and the assessee failed to produce tax invoices from registered dealers.

31 Jul 2014

The State of Karnataka, through the Department of Finance, filed revision petitions under Section 65(1) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, challeng...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of MVAT Provisions on Input Tax Credit Reversal for Capital Goods Sold as Scrap. Section 48(5) of MVAT Act, 2002 and Rule 58A of MVAT Rules, 2005 held intra vires the Constitution and not ultra vires the parent Act.

10 Jun 2013

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by various companies challenging the constitutional validity of Section 48(5) of the Maharashtra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Sales Tax Classification Dispute. Non-prescription sunglasses/goggles are medical devices under Schedule Entry C-107(8) of MVAT Act, 2002, taxable at 4%, not residuary entry E-1 at 12.5%.

9 Aug 2012

The case involves a dispute over the classification of non-prescription sunglasses/goggles under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002. The respon...

12 13 14 15 16

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)