Search Results for "Trading Account"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Trading Account"

1491 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1491 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute Over Unreturned Shares. Concurrent findings of arbitral tribunals that stock broker failed to return client's shares and dividends upheld under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Jan 2017

The petitioner, Manoj Javeri Stock Broking Pvt. Ltd., a member of the Bombay Stock Exchange, challenged an arbitral award and appellate award dated 17...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — No Patent Illegality Found. Claimant's claim for refund of margin money and compensation for unauthorized trades upheld as arbitrator's findings of fact are final under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

17 Dec 2014

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a common arbitral award da...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Seeking Cancellation of Fraudulent PAN, Aadhaar, Bank Account, and GST Registration in Identity Theft Case. Petition Alleged Misuse of Personal Identity to Obtain Documents and Receive Multiple Section 138 NI Act Notices, Raising Questions on Authority Inaction.

21 Jul 2025

The Bombay High Court heard a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by an individual residing in Mumbai who ran a small p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Refusal to Accept Opposition to Trademark Registration Due to Delay. Section 21 of Trade Marks Act, 1999 Prescribes Mandatory Limitation Period of Three Months Plus One Month Extension, and Registrar Has No Power to Entertain Opposition Filed Beyond That Period.

27 Apr 2006

The petitioner, Sardar Gurudas Singh Bedi, trading as Volga Confectionary Works, sought to oppose the registration of the trademark 'Volga Ice Cream' ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Interim Injunction Application in Passing Off Action Over Mark 'Indiacom' vs 'Indicom'. Court Holds That Plaintiff Failed to Establish Prima Facie Case of Passing Off or Deceptive Similarity Between 'Indiacom' and 'Indicom', and Balance of Convenience Favoured Defendant.

28 Oct 2005

The dispute arose from a passing off action filed by Indiacom Limited (plaintiff) seeking to restrain Tata Teleservices Ltd. and others (defendants) f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff's Motion in Trade Mark Infringement Case Involving Use of Registered Mark as Corporate Name for Dissimilar Goods. The Full Bench overruled Raymond Ltd v Raymond Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd and held that Section 29(5) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 provides a separate cause of action for infringement when a registered trade mark is used as a corporate or trading name, even for dissimilar goods.

1 Mar 2017

The case involves a Notice of Motion in a suit filed by CIPLA Limited against M/s. CIPLA Industries Private Limited and Vishal Khanna for alleged infr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Exchange Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court held that the arbitral award was not in conflict with public policy and did not suffer from patent illegality, as the tribunal's findings were based on evidence and were plausible.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, MPDA Associates Pvt. Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Trading Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Arbitrator's Findings on Contract Notes and Liability Upheld as Not Patently Illegal.

24 Sep 2012

The petitioner, Kalyansinh K. Kumpavat, filed an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Trading Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be in Conflict with Public Policy or Suffering from Patent Illegality. The court held that the arbitrator's interpretation of the contract and byelaws was plausible and not perverse, and the award did not warrant interference.

11 Mar 2010

The petitioner, Rajendra Kumar Bothra, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral award d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Reference in Favor of Dealer in Sales Tax Case Regarding Packing Materials Used in Exports. Purchase Tax Not Leviable on Packing Materials Sold Along with Exported Goods Under Section 14 of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959.

18 Mar 2010

The case involves a reference under Section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, at the instance of the Commissioner of Sales Tax, Maharashtra Sta...

12 13 14 15 16

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)