Search Results for "Sole Respondent"

7652 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7652 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010085932008_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956 for Debt Disputed in Good Faith. Petition Filed to Exert Pressure for Unreasonable Demands, Not for Recovery of Genuine Debt.

The petitioner, Fomento Resorts And Hotels Ltd., filed a winding up petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 against the respondent, G...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petitions for Enforcement of Foreign Awards Due to Non-Compliance with Section 47 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Failure to Produce Original or Certified Copies of Arbitration Agreement and Award Renders Petitions Not Maintainable.

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions filed by Armada (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. against Ashapura Minechem Ltd. seeking enforcement of foreign aw...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Appointment Case — Withdrawal of Section 11 Petition Does Not Bar Fresh Application Under IBC. Order 23 Rule 1 CPC Not Applicable to Arbitration Petitions; Section 9 IBC and Section 11 Arbitration Act Seek Different Reliefs.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by M/s HPCL Bio-Fuels Ltd. against the judgment of the Bombay High Court which had appointed a sole arbitra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in Family Property Dispute — No Arbitration Agreement Exists Between Parties. Will Clause Cannot Substitute Arbitration Agreement Under Section 7 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Mrs. Padmini Chandran Menon, filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Terminates Arbitral Tribunal Mandate for Unreasonable Delay in Filing Statement of Claim. Condonation of delay set aside as claimant failed to show sufficient cause for 7-month delay.

The petitioner, Wanbury Ltd., filed a petition under sections 14(1)(a), 14(2), and 32(2)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking a d...