Search Results for "Simultaneous holding"

279 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 279 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Partially Allows Contractor's Appeal in Contract Dispute Over Interest and Escalation Claims. Court holds that interest under Section 34 CPC is discretionary and that escalation claims not pleaded cannot be awarded.

The dispute arose out of a contract for improvement of riding quality of NH-4A in Goa awarded by the State of Goa to P.B. Ibrahim, a Class I PWD Contr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Multiple Criminal Proceedings for Offences Under MMRD Act and IPC; Non-Cognizable Offences Cannot Be Investigated Without Written Complaint by Authorized Officer.

The High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, adjudicated a batch of twelve criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sun Pharma's Trademark Infringement Suit Against Sanofi's METOSAN, Finding No Deceptive Similarity with METOSARTAN. The marks are phonetically and visually distinct, and the products differ in composition, negating likelihood of confusion.

The plaintiff, Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against The Madras Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi Indi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Special Court at Bombay Delivers Judgment in Securities Fraud Case — Accused Face Charges Under IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act for Cheating, Forgery, and Criminal Conspiracy

This criminal case arises from the 1992 securities scam, which severely impacted India's economy. The prosecution alleged that multiple accused person...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Upholds Rejection of Delay Condonation for Filing Appeal Against Ex Parte Decree. Delay of Over 2 Years in Filing Regular Civil Appeal Not Sufficiently Explained, No Sufficient Cause Shown Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The respondent (original plaintiff) filed Regular Civil Suit No. 140/1997 for specific performance of contract against the appellant (original defenda...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Counterfeit Currency Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Criminal Conspiracy. Conviction under Sections 256, 259 read with 120B IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove meeting of minds or knowledge of counterfeit nature.

The appellant, A. Nizamuddin, was convicted by the Special Judge, Bengaluru, under Sections 256 (possession of counterfeit currency), 259 (delivery of...